D1: Basic Research
Basic research that generates new knowledge, insights, methods or technologies, but has no immediate health & care application.
[TRL 1]
Developing novel methods and materials not targeted at a specific health & care application and not for human use
-
R&D1:
Develop generic methods and technology including assessments of biological relevance and indications of biocompatibility
StakeholdersR&D1: Basic/generic research
keep informed- Public partners
- Funders
-
BM1:
Understand IP management and contract-related research disclosure agreements
StakeholdersBM1: Intellectual property and branding
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
Potential funding sources
UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Leverhulme Trust, Royal Society, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities, Companies, internal pump priming schemes
Deliverables
- Generic methods, technology, or materials with indicative evidence of performance (biologically relevant but not for human use).
- For novel materials, characterisation of the materials system properties and performance in non-biological systems.
D2: Strategic Research
Research that addresses a class of health & care problems, developing knowledge, insights, methods or technologies that may underpin innovative solutions.
[TRL 1]
Developing methods and materials to address a specific health & care clinical need (or class of)
-
R&D1:
Develop generic methods and technology of device components, following good laboratory practice (GLP) principles and accurate / detailed record keeping
StakeholdersR&D1: Basic/generic research
keep informed- Public partners
- Funders
-
R&D2:
Perform scientific literature review; applied methods and technology development based on available health & care data to identify potential application areas within biological environment, understand biocompatibility, toxicity issues , and biodegradability (if applicable)
StakeholdersR&D2: Requirements and prior knowledge
have to involve- HC professional
- Public partners
- Research Innovation System
-
HEST1:
Identify potential areas for current and foreseeable healthcare applications
StakeholdersHEST1: Healthcare context (e.g. problem addressed, scale, current QALY/£ cost)
may or may not involve- HC professional
- Industry
- Potential end users
- Public partners
- Research Innovation System
-
R1:
Consider regulatory approval and other governance issues (e.g. MTAs, HTA) for in vitro and in vivo testing of the material and understanding ethical approvals for testing of medical devices in clinical investigations (including contracts and sponsorship).
StakeholdersR1: Research governance / Ethics
have to involve- Study sponsor
- HC professional
- Public partners
-
BM1:
Consider IP protection (e.g. patenting), record funding and contracts for IP ownership
StakeholdersBM1: Intellectual property and branding
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
Potential funding sources
UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Leverhulme Trust, Royal Society, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, Internal translational funding calls, Companies
Deliverables
- Understanding of potential use in healthcare setting
- Understanding of issues around biocompatibility, toxicity, and efficacy in biological systems
- Finding / creating indicative evidence from literature or early studies on performance
- Initiate IP protection if applicable
D3: Concept Development
Research that draws on existing knowledge, insights, methods or technologies to develop the concept for an innovative solution to a specific health & care problem.
[TRL 2]
Reaching out to stakeholders from STEM, applied health research and clinical practice to provide insights necessary todesign and develop an innovative concept/device for addressing a specific health & care problem.
-
R&D2:
Record device requirements, prior knowledge, and evidence of a valid clinical association to inform device specification
StakeholdersR&D2: Requirements and prior knowledge
have to involve- HC professional
- Public partners
- Research Innovation System
-
R&D3:
Prototype design and development (not for human use). Assess efficacy in preclinical models (in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo – small and large animal models)
StakeholdersR&D3: Concept development and refinement leading to prototype
have to involve- Public partners
- HC professional
- Industry
- Potential end users
- Funders
- Research Innovation System
-
R&D4:
Consider human factors that can influence concept design and development (e.g. will the device need removing? what are the consequences if not?)
StakeholdersR&D4: Human factors
have to involve- Potential end users
- Public partners
- Clinical champions
- HC professional
-
R&D5:
Consider responsible innovation, including potential effects on the environment, that can influence concept design and development
StakeholdersR&D5: Responsible innovation
have to involve- Research Innovation System
- Regulatory advisors
- Potential end users
- Industry
- Public partners
- HC professional
-
HEST1:
Understand current and foreseeable specific health & care need
StakeholdersHEST1: Healthcare context (e.g. problem addressed, scale, current QALY/£ cost)
may or may not involve- HC professional
- Industry
- Potential end users
- Public partners
- Research Innovation System
-
HEST2:
Understand current and foreseeable clinical care pathway and guidelines of care for the specific clinical need
StakeholdersHEST2: Current clinical care pathway (guidelines)
have to involve- Research Innovation System
- HC professional
-
HEST3:
Understand current and foreseeable clinical care workflow and current gold standard of care for the specific clinical need
StakeholdersHEST3: Real-world evaluation of clinical care pathway (delivery)
have to involve- Research Innovation System
- HC professional
- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Clinical champions
- Industry
-
HEST4:
Understand on how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice
StakeholdersHEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)
may or may not involve- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Clinical champions
- Research Innovation System
-
HEST5:
Prepare initial target product profile to define an outline of the value proposition – what is the expected benefit of the device in terms of costs, patient care. Consider competing solutions (existing or currently under development) which might impact the clinical need, guidance, workflows or pathways. This will be needed for funding applications and the technical file.
StakeholdersHEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile
may or may not involve- Commissioners
- Clinical champions
- Research Innovation System
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- R2: Intended use and device categorisation
-
HEST6:
Conceptualise health economics evaluation and cost benefit analyses (“desk research”, literature review) and conceptualise a preliminary health economic model which will inform concept development (considering current and upcoming competing solutions).
StakeholdersHEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)
have to involve- Commissioners
- Research Innovation System
- Public partners
- Potential end users
-
R1:
Arrange ethical approvals (including sponsorship) for suitable (pre)clinical testing of concept
StakeholdersR1: Research governance / Ethics
have to involve- Study sponsor
- HC professional
- Public partners
-
R2:
Formalise intended use (based on HEST2/3); Understanding of device regulations and risk classification to inform concept development (including identification of regulatory steps needed for future clinical testing)
StakeholdersR2: Intended use and device categorisation
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
- Study sponsor
- Research Innovation System
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- HEST2: Current clinical care pathway (guidelines)
- HEST3: Real-world evaluation of clinical care pathway (delivery)
-
R3:
Understand the requirements for accurate audit trail / traceability of prototype device development is in place through a quality management system.
StakeholdersR3: Quality management system (ISO 13485 certification)
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
-
P&D1:
Development of prototype and design initial production process (not for human use) with view to adapt (for human use) and scaling up considering regulatory implications for clinical investigations.
StakeholdersP&D1: Manufacturing/software-engineering
have to involve- Funders
- Potential end users
- Regulatory advisors
- Industry
- Clinical champions
- Public partners
- HC professional
-
BM1:
Consider additional IP protection based on concept development (could include design and manufacturing processes), consider freedom to operate; record funding and contracts for IP ownership.
StakeholdersBM1: Intellectual property and branding
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
-
BM2:
Understand the market and its size to determine commercial opportunities and potential economic impact
StakeholdersBM2: Market size (UK, Worldwide)
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
- Industry
-
BM3:
Understand of potential market share based on competing solutions and analysis of competitors
StakeholdersBM3: Market share (realistic assumptions)
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
-
BM4:
Understand on the nature of the intervention within the clinical landscape and consider plans for delivering device to market
StakeholdersBM4: Product vs service
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
- Industry
-
BM5:
Understand potential exit strategies such as commercialisation venues (e.g. spin out vs license vs not-for-profit (e.g. via community interest company) )
StakeholdersBM5: Spinout vs licence
have to involve- Industry
- Technology Transfer Office
-
HCE1:
Collect patient and end user feedback of concept
StakeholdersHCE1: Critical evaluation of concept
have to involve- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Research Innovation System
- HC professional
Potential funding sources
UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Internal translational funding calls, Companies.
Deliverables
- Clearly articulated health & care need
- Solution concept and prototype device manufacturing including plans for scaling up production with clinically relevant methods.
- Draft of intended use statement
- Draft of initial value proposition and target product profile
- Ethical approval ready for preclinical testing in D4 (small and/or large animal models)
- Initial indications of market potential / opportunity (including product/market fit)
D4: Prototype Development & Technical Feasibility
Research that develops the proposed health & care innovation and provides initial evidence for the feasibility of the proposed innovation.
[TRL 3, 4]
Obtain proof of concept of feasibility and efficacy of the prototype device in preclinical model(s). This may be an iterative process that requires testing of multiple different prototypes
-
R&D3:
Full prototype (human use) development, manufacture at good manufacturing practice (GMP) level, and complete pre-clinical testing
StakeholdersR&D3: Concept development and refinement leading to prototype
have to involve- Public partners
- HC professional
- Industry
- Potential end users
- Funders
- Research Innovation System
-
R&D4:
Include human centric design principles in prototype
StakeholdersR&D4: Human factors
have to involve- Potential end users
- Public partners
- Clinical champions
- HC professional
-
R&D5:
Ensure prototype design meets regulatory and GMP manufacturing requirements, is sustainable in design, is sourced from ethically verified materials and its manufacture is auditable. This can be performed by external industry partner/ test house
StakeholdersR&D5: Responsible innovation
have to involve- Research Innovation System
- Regulatory advisors
- Potential end users
- Industry
- Public partners
- HC professional
-
R&D6:
Determine if biocompatibility / toxicity / biodegradability and formulation of prototype device with methods and materials that are suitable for (human) use in a clinical setting and compare to current clinical solutions. This can be performed by external industry partner/ test house
StakeholdersR&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)
have to involve- HC professional
- Clinical champions
- Funders
- Potential end users
- Industry
- Public partners
-
R&D7:
Adapt prototype based on pre-clinical data and key stakeholder feedback to ensure health and care feasibility will be achieved (design input)
StakeholdersR&D7: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care feasibility and efficacy
have to involve- Research Innovation System
- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Clinical champions
- HC professional
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- HCE1: Critical evaluation of concept
-
HEST4:
Review how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice
StakeholdersHEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)
may or may not involve- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Clinical champions
- Research Innovation System
-
HEST5:
Review the value proposition for the developed prototype highlighting benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions.
StakeholdersHEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile
may or may not involve- Commissioners
- Clinical champions
- Research Innovation System
-
HEST6:
Review the conceptualised health economics model and cost benefit analyses which will inform on what data needs to be collected.
StakeholdersHEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)
have to involve- Commissioners
- Research Innovation System
- Public partners
- Potential end users
-
R1:
Prepare ethics and research governance applications (including sponsorship) for clinical investigations / feasibility studies in T1 – T4 stages
StakeholdersR1: Research governance / Ethics
have to involve- Study sponsor
- HC professional
- Public partners
-
R2:
Determine device categorisation and necessary regulatory approvals required.
StakeholdersR2: Intended use and device categorisation
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
- Study sponsor
- Research Innovation System
-
R3:
Ensure accurate audit trail / traceability of prototype device development (inc. device materials, design iterations and equipment uses) is in place for example by working through a quality management system (ISO13485)
StakeholdersR3: Quality management system (ISO 13485 certification)
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
-
R4:
Initialise a technical file (incl risk assessment), determine the documentation required for MHRA notification for clinical investigation approval
StakeholdersR4: Clinical investigation approval
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
- HC professional
- Potential end users
- Study sponsor
- Public partners
-
R5:
Understand the requirements for Regulatory Approvals (e.g. CE / UKCA / FDA / other). Ensure requirements for clinical investigation standards are met.
StakeholdersR5: CE / UKCA marking
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
- Industry
-
P&D1:
Optimise the full prototype (if applicable) for human use and refine production methods for preclinical testing. Seek industry partners (including service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors - also considering start-up formation)
StakeholdersP&D1: Manufacturing/software-engineering
have to involve- Funders
- Potential end users
- Regulatory advisors
- Industry
- Clinical champions
- Public partners
- HC professional
-
P&D2:
Develop testing protocols for the full prototype in pre-clinical models and understanding of protocols for the final product required for clinical investigations.
StakeholdersP&D2: Testing protocols
have to involve- Industry
-
P&D3:
Test compliance with technical file requirements (safety, compliance, interoperability and usability)
StakeholdersP&D3: Safety, compliance, interoperability and usability
have to involve- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Regulatory advisors
- Industry
- HC professional
- Clinical champions
-
P&D4:
Conduct quality control of the prototype according to product specifications
StakeholdersP&D4: Quality control
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
-
BM2:
Identify market (i.e. target payer vs user), refine market size analysis to determine if there is a viable market
StakeholdersBM2: Market size (UK, Worldwide)
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
- Industry
-
BM3:
Refine market share analysis including analysis of competitors and opportunities and Finalise market share assumptions to feed into HEST4
StakeholdersBM3: Market share (realistic assumptions)
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
-
BM4:
Start defining the nature of the intervention within the clinical landscape and initialize plans for delivering device to market
StakeholdersBM4: Product vs service
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
- Industry
-
BM5:
Start Exploring potential exit strategies such as commercialisation venues (e.g. spin out vs license vs not-for-profit (e.g. via community interest company))
StakeholdersBM5: Spinout vs licence
have to involve- Industry
- Technology Transfer Office
-
BM6:
Draft an outline of the business model (considering future requirements/steps, plan to seek for investors/funding for larger / pivotal / multisite clinical studies)
StakeholdersBM6: Business plan / canvas
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
-
HCE1:
Evaluate prototype in the competitive landscape based on pre-clinical studies (i.e. how does the prototype compare to gold standard). Create a clinical evaluation plan (CEP) to define the scope and outline the systematic approach of the planned clinical investigation to demonstrate scientific, analytical and clinical validity
StakeholdersHCE1: Critical evaluation of concept
have to involve- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Research Innovation System
- HC professional
Potential funding sources
UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Innovate UK, Internal translational funding calls, Companies
Deliverables
- Full functional prototype (for human use) with indicative evidence of performance in relevant preclinical models
- Obtain safety testing certification for full prototype
- Auditable records available (e.g. QMS) for device component manufacturing and device testing.
- Revised value proposition and target product profile
- Finalised intended use statement
- Potential service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors have been identified
- Revised summary of market opportunity (demonstrating commercial feasibility and competitiveness)
- Proposed strategy for delivering the innovation to market (including academic exit strategy)
- Initial outline business model
- Initial regulatory risk assessment
- Initial technical file
- Clinical evaluation plan
T1: Product Development & Healthcare Feasibility
Research that further develops the proposed health & care innovation and provides reproducible evidence for its efficacy and safety in a relevant environment.
[TRL 5, 6]
Perform feasibility studies in clinical setting (Phase I, first in man study) with refined prototype to generate evidence of health & care relevance and safety in a realistic but controlled health & care setting. This may be an iterative process that requires testing of multiple different prototypes before committing to the final design
-
R&D6:
Refine the final prototype for use in a small scale, first in man, feasibility study on small patient groups for usability, safety testing and considerations of efficacy
StakeholdersR&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)
have to involve- HC professional
- Clinical champions
- Funders
- Potential end users
- Industry
- Public partners
-
R&D7:
Adapt prototype based on preliminary clinical data and key stakeholder feedback to ensure health and care feasibility and efficacy will be achieved (design input)
StakeholdersR&D7: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care feasibility and efficacy
have to involve- Research Innovation System
- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Clinical champions
- HC professional
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- HCE2: Health and care feasibility
- R4: Clinical investigation approval
-
R&D8:
Refine the prototype to ensure health and care effectiveness will be achieved
StakeholdersR&D8: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care effectiveness
have to involve- Clinical champions
- Public partners
- Research Innovation System
- Potential end users
- HC professional
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- HCE2: Health and care feasibility
-
R&D9:
Completion of R&D activities including the creation of the Device Master List (DML, detailing all processes required to create the device; to include in the technical file) and freeze of the design of the refined product.
StakeholdersR&D9: Freeze design
may or may not involve- Industry
- Potential end users
- Public partners
- HC professional
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- HCE2: Health and care feasibility
-
HEST4:
Refine how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice
StakeholdersHEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)
may or may not involve- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Clinical champions
- Research Innovation System
-
HEST5:
Refine a value proposition for the developed prototype highlighting benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions
StakeholdersHEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile
may or may not involve- Commissioners
- Clinical champions
- Research Innovation System
-
HEST6:
Refine the conceptualisation of the health economics model and cost benefit analyses which will inform health economics data collection needs
StakeholdersHEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)
have to involve- Commissioners
- Research Innovation System
- Public partners
- Potential end users
-
R1:
Gain ethical and research governance clearance (including sponsorship) for current and subsequent clinical studies
StakeholdersR1: Research governance / Ethics
have to involve- Study sponsor
- HC professional
- Public partners
-
R3:
Obtain ISO 13485 Certification, and any other required ISO certificates (e.g. 27001). Relevant ISO standard include (but are not limited to) ISO 10993 (biological testing requirements), ISO 14644 (GMP manufacturing), ISO 14155 (GCP – good clinical practice), ISO-11137-2 ISO 11737 (sterilisation and validation of sterilisation), and ISO 14971 (risk management), ISO 20417 (information to be supplied by manufacturer), ISO 14630 (non active surgical implants), ISO 15223 (labelling), ISO 11607 (packaging), and ISO 20416 (post market surveillance.) Involve industry partners (e.g. manufacturer) as needed to obtain ISO certification.
StakeholdersR3: Quality management system (ISO 13485 certification)
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
-
R4:
Refine and submit the technical file (e.g. design decisions, regulatory risk assessments, test methods) for MHRA approval for clinical investigation
StakeholdersR4: Clinical investigation approval
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
- HC professional
- Potential end users
- Study sponsor
- Public partners
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- R&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)
-
R5:
Start collecting clinical evidence on efficacy and safety for Regulatory compliance (e.g. CE/UKCA/FDA/Other), and if affecting clinical outcomes run the study to accepted good clinical practice (GCP) standards (e.g. ISO14155)
StakeholdersR5: CE / UKCA marking
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
- Industry
-
P&D1:
Work with industry partners (including service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors- also considering start-up formation) to produce the final quality assured product, based on the final prototype, to be used in clinical setting
StakeholdersP&D1: Manufacturing/software-engineering
have to involve- Funders
- Potential end users
- Regulatory advisors
- Industry
- Clinical champions
- Public partners
- HC professional
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- R&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)
- R&D7: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care feasibility and efficacy
- R&D8: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care effectiveness
- R&D9: Freeze design
-
P&D2:
Develop testing protocols for the final quality assured product in a clinical setting
StakeholdersP&D2: Testing protocols
have to involve- Industry
-
P&D3:
Test compliance with technical file requirements (safety, compliance, interoperability and usability)
StakeholdersP&D3: Safety, compliance, interoperability and usability
have to involve- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Regulatory advisors
- Industry
- HC professional
- Clinical champions
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- P&D5: Scale-up
-
P&D4:
Conduct quality control of the product according to product specifications
StakeholdersP&D4: Quality control
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- P&D5: Scale-up
-
P&D5:
Scale up production and batch release (GMP compliant) for first in man clinical investigation
StakeholdersP&D5: Scale-up
keep informed- Research Innovation System
- Funders
- Industry
-
BM4:
Finalise the nature of the intervention within the clinical landscape and initialize plans for delivering device to market
StakeholdersBM4: Product vs service
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
- Industry
-
BM5:
Finalise plans for potential academic exit strategies such as commercialisation venues (e.g. spin out vs license vs not-for-profit (e.g. via community interest company)) to position the proposed intervention within the clinical landscape
StakeholdersBM5: Spinout vs licence
have to involve- Industry
- Technology Transfer Office
-
BM6:
Refine the business model (considering future requirements/steps, plan to seek for investors/funding for larger / pivotal / multisite clinical studies)
StakeholdersBM6: Business plan / canvas
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
-
HCE1:
Position of the concept within the competitive landscape and perform health & care risk assessment
StakeholdersHCE1: Critical evaluation of concept
have to involve- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Research Innovation System
- HC professional
-
HCE2:
Perform clinical evaluation of prototype in first in man, Phase I, clinical investigation study to assess feasibility and safety
StakeholdersHCE2: Health and care feasibility
have to involve- Research Innovation System
- HC professional
- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Regulatory advisors
- Clinical champions
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- R4: Clinical investigation approval
-
HCE3:
Perform clinical evaluation of prototype clinical investigation study to assess feasibility, safety, and efficacy. This can be, but does not need to be, the same clinical investigation undertaken in HCE2
StakeholdersHCE3: Health and care evaluation of safety and efficacy
have to involve- Potential end users
- Public partners
- Research Innovation System
- Regulatory advisors
- HC professional
- Clinical champions
Potential funding sources
UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), Innovate UK, Internal translational funding calls, Companies, Venture capitalists
Deliverables
- Final product (frozen development/design)
- Submission of the revised technical file and obtain MHRA approval for clinical investigation
- Refine GMP manufacturing and release of batch for clinical testing
- Phase I, first in man, safety testing of GMP prototype in small cohorts (10-20) for preliminary feasibility, safety and efficacy assessment, and to inform larger study design
- Revised value proposition and target product profile
- Conceptual health economic model with preliminary data
- Relationships have been established with potential service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors
- Development process according to ISO13485
- Revised strategy for delivering the innovation to market (including academic exit strategy)
- Revised outline business model
- Evidence of utility in a health and care setting
T2: Product Testing & Proof-of-value
Investigations that evaluate the proposed innovation in a health & care setting, providing actionable evidence of its efficacy, effectiveness and safety in a patient population.
[TRL 7]
Perform pivotal studies in larger cohorts to assess safety, efficacy, and effectiveness
-
HEST4:
Refine how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice based on your own data acquired in the clinical investigation
StakeholdersHEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)
may or may not involve- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Clinical champions
- Research Innovation System
-
HEST5:
Refine the value proposition for the developed prototype by integrating your own data to highlight benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions
StakeholdersHEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile
may or may not involve- Commissioners
- Clinical champions
- Research Innovation System
-
HEST6:
Refine health economics evaluation by integrating your own data to inform the cost benefit analyses
StakeholdersHEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)
have to involve- Commissioners
- Research Innovation System
- Public partners
- Potential end users
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- HCE3: Health and care evaluation of safety and efficacy
- HCE4: Health and care validation of safety and efficacy, effectiveness
-
R1:
Gain ethical and research governance clearance (including sponsorship) for current and subsequent clinical studies
StakeholdersR1: Research governance / Ethics
have to involve- Study sponsor
- HC professional
- Public partners
-
R4:
Seek approval for subsequent clinical studies. Notify Regulatory Authority (e.g. MHRA in the UK) of any design changes that might have occurred since the first clinical investigation approval
StakeholdersR4: Clinical investigation approval
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
- HC professional
- Potential end users
- Study sponsor
- Public partners
-
R5:
Refine the technical file for Regulatory Compliance (e.g. CE/UKCA/FDA/Other) (e.g. design decisions, risk assessments, test methods) (engaging notified body)
StakeholdersR5: CE / UKCA marking
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
- Industry
-
P&D3:
Test compliance with technical file requirements (safety, compliance, interoperability and usability)
StakeholdersP&D3: Safety, compliance, interoperability and usability
have to involve- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Regulatory advisors
- Industry
- HC professional
- Clinical champions
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- P&D5: Scale-up
-
P&D4:
Conduct quality control of the product according to product specifications
StakeholdersP&D4: Quality control
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- P&D5: Scale-up
-
P&D5:
Increase manufacturing (if needed) for the larger clinical investigation studies
StakeholdersP&D5: Scale-up
keep informed- Research Innovation System
- Funders
- Industry
-
BM4:
Review commercial strategy to deliver the device to market (consider refinements of the product/service)
StakeholdersBM4: Product vs service
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
- Industry
-
BM5:
Review commercial strategy including the academic exit strategy (e.g. spinout vs license)
StakeholdersBM5: Spinout vs licence
have to involve- Industry
- Technology Transfer Office
-
BM6:
Refine business model to implement future steps
StakeholdersBM6: Business plan / canvas
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
-
BM7:
Assess the commercial viability of the product to confirm that the manufacturing, distribution and marketing of the device is financially sustainable (including return-on-investment analysis); seek company or venture capitalist funding
StakeholdersBM7: Investment required and RoI
have to involve- Funders
- Technology Transfer Office
-
HCE3:
Conduct large scale clinical investigation study in relevant patient groups to validate safety and efficacy of the device
StakeholdersHCE3: Health and care evaluation of safety and efficacy
have to involve- Potential end users
- Public partners
- Research Innovation System
- Regulatory advisors
- HC professional
- Clinical champions
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- R4: Clinical investigation approval
-
HCE4:
Larger scale / pivotal / multisite clinical investigation study in relevant patient groups to validate safety, efficacy and effectiveness of the device. Write a clinical evaluation report (CER) summarising the clinical outcomes of the clinical investigations for inclusion in technical file to notified body.
StakeholdersHCE4: Health and care validation of safety and efficacy, effectiveness
have to involve- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Research Innovation System
- Regulatory advisors
- HC professional
- Clinical champions
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- R4: Clinical investigation approval
-
HCE5:
Initialise plans for post-market surveillance to include in technical plan and clinical follow up
StakeholdersHCE5: Real world evidence post-launch
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
- Clinical champions
- Potential end users
- Public partners
- Research Innovation System
- HC professional
- Funders
Potential funding sources
UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), Innovate UK, Internal translational funding calls, Companies, Venture capitalists
Deliverables
- Clinical assessment of feasibility, safety and efficacy in large clinical investigation study
- Clinical validation of safety, efficacy, and effectiveness in a larger/pivotal clinical study
- Partnerships have been formed with key stakeholders (e.g. suppliers, service providers, manufacturers, distributors / customers)
- Clinical Evaluation Report (CER)
T3: Regulatory Approvals & Route-to-market
Activities that finalise the regulatory approvals, and the commercialisation, implementation and scaling-up strategies for the health & care innovation.
[TRL 8]
Obtaining Regulatory approvals; service transformation modelling and health economics modelling to prove benefit of device; development of business plan to attract funding for launch and adoption into market.
-
HEST4:
Finalise how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice (health & care pathway based on your own data acquired in the clinical investigation
StakeholdersHEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)
may or may not involve- Public partners
- Potential end users
- Clinical champions
- Research Innovation System
-
HEST5:
Finalise the value proposition for the developed prototype by integrating your own data to highlight benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions
StakeholdersHEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile
may or may not involve- Commissioners
- Clinical champions
- Research Innovation System
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)
- HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)
-
HEST6:
Finalising full Health economics evaluation and cost benefit analyses
StakeholdersHEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)
have to involve- Commissioners
- Research Innovation System
- Public partners
- Potential end users
-
HEST7:
Define the end user-business model / procurement case
StakeholdersHEST7: End-user business model / Procurement case
have to involve- Research Innovation System
- Commissioners
- Technology Transfer Office
-
HEST8:
Consider adoption of the product into policy and/or guidelines as a routine method or approach; NICE Health Technology Evaluation (Early Evaluation Assessment)
StakeholdersHEST8: NICE Health Technology Evaluation
have to involve- Research Innovation System
- Regulatory advisors
- Commissioners
-
R5:
Finalise and submit technical file (e.g. design decisions, risk assessments, clinical evaluation report) for CE marking (EU) or UKCA marking (UK only)
StakeholdersR5: CE / UKCA marking
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
- Industry
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch
-
P&D5:
Increase manufacturing for future commercialisation / industry adoption following quality assurance processes to ensure safety and compliance with product specifications. If changes in manufacturing are needed, further regulatory approvals might be required.
StakeholdersP&D5: Scale-up
keep informed- Research Innovation System
- Funders
- Industry
-
BM6:
Finalise and implement the chosen full business model
StakeholdersBM6: Business plan / canvas
have to involve- Technology Transfer Office
-
BM7:
Confirm commercial viability of the product; seek company or venture capitalist funding
StakeholdersBM7: Investment required and RoI
have to involve- Funders
- Technology Transfer Office
-
BM8:
Refine sales and marketing strategy based on business model
StakeholdersBM8: Marketing and promotion
may or may not involve- Technology Transfer Office
-
HCE5:
Refine and finalise plans for post-market surveillance to include in technical plan and clinical follow up
StakeholdersHCE5: Real world evidence post-launch
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
- Clinical champions
- Potential end users
- Public partners
- Research Innovation System
- HC professional
- Funders
Potential funding sources
NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), Horizon Europe, other charities including condition-specific charities, internal translational funding calls, companies, venture capitalists
Deliverables
- Increase manufacturing for industry adoption
- Finalised value proposition and target product profile
- Full health economic analysis
- Full business model
- Clinical evaluation report
- Finalised technical file (including revised regulatory risk assessment) for Regulatory Approval (e.g. CE/UKCA/FDA/Other)
- Product ready for deployment
- Sales and marketing plan
- Post-market surveillance plan / Post-market Clinical Follow-up plan.
T4: Product Launch & Real-world Learning
Activities that lead to product launch, and evaluation of the real-world effectiveness and safety of the innovation, to avoid harm and inform future developments.
[TRL 9]
Collecting real-world evidence, monitor long term safety, efficacy and usage of the device in the general population. This might inform future improvements of the product which might require additional regulatory approvals.
-
HEST7:
Monitor the end user-business model / procurement case (e.g. product adoption and effect on service post market); ongoing health economic analysis
StakeholdersHEST7: End-user business model / Procurement case
have to involve- Research Innovation System
- Commissioners
- Technology Transfer Office
-
HEST8:
Obtaining NICE Health Technology Evaluation recommendation
StakeholdersHEST8: NICE Health Technology Evaluation
have to involve- Research Innovation System
- Regulatory advisors
- Commissioners
-
R6:
Collate post market post-market clinical evidence; update clinical evaluation report annually and maintain quality management system
StakeholdersR6: Post-market surveillance (PMS) and post-market clinical follow up (PMCF)
have to involve- Potential end users
- Regulatory advisors
- Industry
- HC professional
- Public partners
- Funders
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch
-
P&D5:
Ensure that manufacturing is performed at a scale which meets with market demand, or further increase manufacturing output if required. If changes in manufacturing are needed, further regulatory approvals might be required.
StakeholdersP&D5: Scale-up
keep informed- Research Innovation System
- Funders
- Industry
DependenciesBefore undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
- P&D6: Production and distribution
-
P&D6:
Product launch and distribution (including strategies for communication and training processes to increase acceptability by end users)
StakeholdersP&D6: Production and distribution
have to involve- Industry
-
BM8:
Market and promote of device on new markets
StakeholdersBM8: Marketing and promotion
may or may not involve- Technology Transfer Office
-
HCE5:
Real world evidence post launch (Phase 4); Post-market surveillance and post-market clinical follow-up of the product to collect data on long-term effectiveness, potential adverse effects, and usage of the device
StakeholdersHCE5: Real world evidence post-launch
have to involve- Regulatory advisors
- Clinical champions
- Potential end users
- Public partners
- Research Innovation System
- HC professional
- Funders
Potential funding sources
NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), companies, venture capitalists
Deliverables
- Product launch, adoption and monitoring
- End-user business model / procurement case
- NICE Health Technology Evaluation recommendation (if appropriate)
- Updated clinical evaluation report (CER) with post-market surveillance data and post-market clinical follow-up data.
Basic research that generates new knowledge, insights, methods or technologies, but has no immediate health & care application.
[TRL 1]
Developing novel methods and materials not targeted at a specific health & care application and not for human use
Research and Development (R&D) activities
The R&D lifecycle of a medical device involves the work directed towards the development of an innovation, and/or the improvement of products and processes that are undertaken by researchers (e.g. at an academic/clinical institution or within industry R&D teams).
R&D1: Basic/generic research
Develop generic methods and technology including assessments of biological relevance and indications of biocompatibility
No dependencies
Business Model (BM) activities
A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.
BM1: Intellectual property and branding
Understand IP management and contract-related research disclosure agreements
No dependencies
Potential funding sources
UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Leverhulme Trust, Royal Society, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities, Companies, internal pump priming schemes
Deliverables
- Generic methods, technology, or materials with indicative evidence of performance (biologically relevant but not for human use).
- For novel materials, characterisation of the materials system properties and performance in non-biological systems.
Research that addresses a class of health & care problems, developing knowledge, insights, methods or technologies that may underpin innovative solutions.
[TRL 1]
Developing methods and materials to address a specific health & care clinical need (or class of)
Research and Development (R&D) activities
The R&D lifecycle of a medical device involves the work directed towards the development of an innovation, and/or the improvement of products and processes that are undertaken by researchers (e.g. at an academic/clinical institution or within industry R&D teams).
R&D1: Basic/generic research
Develop generic methods and technology of device components, following good laboratory practice (GLP) principles and accurate / detailed record keeping
No dependencies
R&D2: Requirements and prior knowledge
Perform scientific literature review; applied methods and technology development based on available health & care data to identify potential application areas within biological environment, understand biocompatibility, toxicity issues , and biodegradability (if applicable)
No dependencies
Health Economics & Service Transformation (HEST) activities
The translation of a health technology innovation to a medical device used in clinical practice requires an understanding of the costs and benefits of the device as well as of how the device will be embedded in the clinical service.
HEST1: Healthcare context (e.g. problem addressed, scale, current QALY/£ cost)
Identify potential areas for current and foreseeable healthcare applications
No dependencies
Regulation (R) activities
The development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and use of a medical device are governed by a set of laws, standards and guidelines. These regulations are put in place to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical device.
R1: Research governance / Ethics
Consider regulatory approval and other governance issues (e.g. MTAs, HTA) for in vitro and in vivo testing of the material and understanding ethical approvals for testing of medical devices in clinical investigations (including contracts and sponsorship).
No dependencies
Business Model (BM) activities
A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.
BM1: Intellectual property and branding
Consider IP protection (e.g. patenting), record funding and contracts for IP ownership
No dependencies
Potential funding sources
UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Leverhulme Trust, Royal Society, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, Internal translational funding calls, Companies
Deliverables
- Understanding of potential use in healthcare setting
- Understanding of issues around biocompatibility, toxicity, and efficacy in biological systems
- Finding / creating indicative evidence from literature or early studies on performance
- Initiate IP protection if applicable
Research that draws on existing knowledge, insights, methods or technologies to develop the concept for an innovative solution to a specific health & care problem.
[TRL 2]
Reaching out to stakeholders from STEM, applied health research and clinical practice to provide insights necessary todesign and develop an innovative concept/device for addressing a specific health & care problem.
Research and Development (R&D) activities
The R&D lifecycle of a medical device involves the work directed towards the development of an innovation, and/or the improvement of products and processes that are undertaken by researchers (e.g. at an academic/clinical institution or within industry R&D teams).
R&D2: Requirements and prior knowledge
Record device requirements, prior knowledge, and evidence of a valid clinical association to inform device specification
No dependencies
R&D3: Concept development and refinement leading to prototype
Prototype design and development (not for human use). Assess efficacy in preclinical models (in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo – small and large animal models)
No dependencies
R&D4: Human factors
Consider human factors that can influence concept design and development (e.g. will the device need removing? what are the consequences if not?)
No dependencies
R&D5: Responsible innovation
Consider responsible innovation, including potential effects on the environment, that can influence concept design and development
No dependencies
Health Economics & Service Transformation (HEST) activities
The translation of a health technology innovation to a medical device used in clinical practice requires an understanding of the costs and benefits of the device as well as of how the device will be embedded in the clinical service.
HEST1: Healthcare context (e.g. problem addressed, scale, current QALY/£ cost)
Understand current and foreseeable specific health & care need
No dependencies
HEST2: Current clinical care pathway (guidelines)
Understand current and foreseeable clinical care pathway and guidelines of care for the specific clinical need
No dependencies
HEST3: Real-world evaluation of clinical care pathway (delivery)
Understand current and foreseeable clinical care workflow and current gold standard of care for the specific clinical need
No dependencies
HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)
Understand on how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice
No dependencies
HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile
Prepare initial target product profile to define an outline of the value proposition – what is the expected benefit of the device in terms of costs, patient care. Consider competing solutions (existing or currently under development) which might impact the clinical need, guidance, workflows or pathways. This will be needed for funding applications and the technical file.
- R2: Intended use and device categorisation
HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)
Conceptualise health economics evaluation and cost benefit analyses (“desk research”, literature review) and conceptualise a preliminary health economic model which will inform concept development (considering current and upcoming competing solutions).
No dependencies
Regulation (R) activities
The development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and use of a medical device are governed by a set of laws, standards and guidelines. These regulations are put in place to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical device.
R1: Research governance / Ethics
Arrange ethical approvals (including sponsorship) for suitable (pre)clinical testing of concept
No dependencies
R2: Intended use and device categorisation
Formalise intended use (based on HEST2/3); Understanding of device regulations and risk classification to inform concept development (including identification of regulatory steps needed for future clinical testing)
- HEST2: Current clinical care pathway (guidelines)
- HEST3: Real-world evaluation of clinical care pathway (delivery)
R3: Quality management system (ISO 13485 certification)
Understand the requirements for accurate audit trail / traceability of prototype device development is in place through a quality management system.
No dependencies
Productisation & Distribution (P&D) activities
The innovative technology needs to be manufactured into a regulated medical device product for it to be delivered to the end user (e.g. healthcare provider, patient). This process includes activities around quality control, packaging/labelling as well as distribution and sales.
P&D1: Manufacturing/software-engineering
Development of prototype and design initial production process (not for human use) with view to adapt (for human use) and scaling up considering regulatory implications for clinical investigations.
No dependencies
Business Model (BM) activities
A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.
BM1: Intellectual property and branding
Consider additional IP protection based on concept development (could include design and manufacturing processes), consider freedom to operate; record funding and contracts for IP ownership.
No dependencies
BM2: Market size (UK, Worldwide)
Understand the market and its size to determine commercial opportunities and potential economic impact
No dependencies
BM3: Market share (realistic assumptions)
Understand of potential market share based on competing solutions and analysis of competitors
No dependencies
BM4: Product vs service
Understand on the nature of the intervention within the clinical landscape and consider plans for delivering device to market
No dependencies
BM5: Spinout vs licence
Understand potential exit strategies such as commercialisation venues (e.g. spin out vs license vs not-for-profit (e.g. via community interest company) )
No dependencies
Health and Care Evaluation (HCE) activities
Health and care evaluation of a health technology innovation involves assessing its safety, efficacy and effectiveness. This assessment is necessary for regulatory approval of the innovation as medical device before it enters the market. It also includes ongoing monitoring of the device once it is being used in clinical practice.
HCE1: Critical evaluation of concept
Collect patient and end user feedback of concept
No dependencies
Potential funding sources
UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Internal translational funding calls, Companies.
Deliverables
- Clearly articulated health & care need
- Solution concept and prototype device manufacturing including plans for scaling up production with clinically relevant methods.
- Draft of intended use statement
- Draft of initial value proposition and target product profile
- Ethical approval ready for preclinical testing in D4 (small and/or large animal models)
- Initial indications of market potential / opportunity (including product/market fit)
Research that develops the proposed health & care innovation and provides initial evidence for the feasibility of the proposed innovation.
[TRL 3, 4]
Obtain proof of concept of feasibility and efficacy of the prototype device in preclinical model(s). This may be an iterative process that requires testing of multiple different prototypes
Research and Development (R&D) activities
The R&D lifecycle of a medical device involves the work directed towards the development of an innovation, and/or the improvement of products and processes that are undertaken by researchers (e.g. at an academic/clinical institution or within industry R&D teams).
R&D3: Concept development and refinement leading to prototype
Full prototype (human use) development, manufacture at good manufacturing practice (GMP) level, and complete pre-clinical testing
No dependencies
R&D4: Human factors
Include human centric design principles in prototype
No dependencies
R&D5: Responsible innovation
Ensure prototype design meets regulatory and GMP manufacturing requirements, is sustainable in design, is sourced from ethically verified materials and its manufacture is auditable. This can be performed by external industry partner/ test house
No dependencies
R&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)
Determine if biocompatibility / toxicity / biodegradability and formulation of prototype device with methods and materials that are suitable for (human) use in a clinical setting and compare to current clinical solutions. This can be performed by external industry partner/ test house
No dependencies
R&D7: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care feasibility and efficacy
Adapt prototype based on pre-clinical data and key stakeholder feedback to ensure health and care feasibility will be achieved (design input)
- HCE1: Critical evaluation of concept
Health Economics & Service Transformation (HEST) activities
The translation of a health technology innovation to a medical device used in clinical practice requires an understanding of the costs and benefits of the device as well as of how the device will be embedded in the clinical service.
HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)
Review how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice
No dependencies
HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile
Review the value proposition for the developed prototype highlighting benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions.
No dependencies
HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)
Review the conceptualised health economics model and cost benefit analyses which will inform on what data needs to be collected.
No dependencies
Regulation (R) activities
The development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and use of a medical device are governed by a set of laws, standards and guidelines. These regulations are put in place to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical device.
R1: Research governance / Ethics
Prepare ethics and research governance applications (including sponsorship) for clinical investigations / feasibility studies in T1 – T4 stages
No dependencies
R2: Intended use and device categorisation
Determine device categorisation and necessary regulatory approvals required.
No dependencies
R3: Quality management system (ISO 13485 certification)
Ensure accurate audit trail / traceability of prototype device development (inc. device materials, design iterations and equipment uses) is in place for example by working through a quality management system (ISO13485)
No dependencies
R4: Clinical investigation approval
Initialise a technical file (incl risk assessment), determine the documentation required for MHRA notification for clinical investigation approval
No dependencies
R5: CE / UKCA marking
Understand the requirements for Regulatory Approvals (e.g. CE / UKCA / FDA / other). Ensure requirements for clinical investigation standards are met.
No dependencies
Productisation & Distribution (P&D) activities
The innovative technology needs to be manufactured into a regulated medical device product for it to be delivered to the end user (e.g. healthcare provider, patient). This process includes activities around quality control, packaging/labelling as well as distribution and sales.
P&D1: Manufacturing/software-engineering
Optimise the full prototype (if applicable) for human use and refine production methods for preclinical testing. Seek industry partners (including service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors - also considering start-up formation)
No dependencies
P&D2: Testing protocols
Develop testing protocols for the full prototype in pre-clinical models and understanding of protocols for the final product required for clinical investigations.
No dependencies
P&D3: Safety, compliance, interoperability and usability
Test compliance with technical file requirements (safety, compliance, interoperability and usability)
No dependencies
P&D4: Quality control
Conduct quality control of the prototype according to product specifications
No dependencies
Business Model (BM) activities
A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.
BM2: Market size (UK, Worldwide)
Identify market (i.e. target payer vs user), refine market size analysis to determine if there is a viable market
No dependencies
BM3: Market share (realistic assumptions)
Refine market share analysis including analysis of competitors and opportunities and Finalise market share assumptions to feed into HEST4
No dependencies
BM4: Product vs service
Start defining the nature of the intervention within the clinical landscape and initialize plans for delivering device to market
No dependencies
BM5: Spinout vs licence
Start Exploring potential exit strategies such as commercialisation venues (e.g. spin out vs license vs not-for-profit (e.g. via community interest company))
No dependencies
BM6: Business plan / canvas
Draft an outline of the business model (considering future requirements/steps, plan to seek for investors/funding for larger / pivotal / multisite clinical studies)
No dependencies
Health and Care Evaluation (HCE) activities
Health and care evaluation of a health technology innovation involves assessing its safety, efficacy and effectiveness. This assessment is necessary for regulatory approval of the innovation as medical device before it enters the market. It also includes ongoing monitoring of the device once it is being used in clinical practice.
HCE1: Critical evaluation of concept
Evaluate prototype in the competitive landscape based on pre-clinical studies (i.e. how does the prototype compare to gold standard). Create a clinical evaluation plan (CEP) to define the scope and outline the systematic approach of the planned clinical investigation to demonstrate scientific, analytical and clinical validity
No dependencies
Potential funding sources
UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Innovate UK, Internal translational funding calls, Companies
Deliverables
- Full functional prototype (for human use) with indicative evidence of performance in relevant preclinical models
- Obtain safety testing certification for full prototype
- Auditable records available (e.g. QMS) for device component manufacturing and device testing.
- Revised value proposition and target product profile
- Finalised intended use statement
- Potential service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors have been identified
- Revised summary of market opportunity (demonstrating commercial feasibility and competitiveness)
- Proposed strategy for delivering the innovation to market (including academic exit strategy)
- Initial outline business model
- Initial regulatory risk assessment
- Initial technical file
- Clinical evaluation plan
Research that further develops the proposed health & care innovation and provides reproducible evidence for its efficacy and safety in a relevant environment.
[TRL 5, 6]
Perform feasibility studies in clinical setting (Phase I, first in man study) with refined prototype to generate evidence of health & care relevance and safety in a realistic but controlled health & care setting. This may be an iterative process that requires testing of multiple different prototypes before committing to the final design
Research and Development (R&D) activities
The R&D lifecycle of a medical device involves the work directed towards the development of an innovation, and/or the improvement of products and processes that are undertaken by researchers (e.g. at an academic/clinical institution or within industry R&D teams).
R&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)
Refine the final prototype for use in a small scale, first in man, feasibility study on small patient groups for usability, safety testing and considerations of efficacy
No dependencies
R&D7: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care feasibility and efficacy
Adapt prototype based on preliminary clinical data and key stakeholder feedback to ensure health and care feasibility and efficacy will be achieved (design input)
- HCE2: Health and care feasibility
- R4: Clinical investigation approval
R&D8: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care effectiveness
Refine the prototype to ensure health and care effectiveness will be achieved
- HCE2: Health and care feasibility
R&D9: Freeze design
Completion of R&D activities including the creation of the Device Master List (DML, detailing all processes required to create the device; to include in the technical file) and freeze of the design of the refined product.
- HCE2: Health and care feasibility
Health Economics & Service Transformation (HEST) activities
The translation of a health technology innovation to a medical device used in clinical practice requires an understanding of the costs and benefits of the device as well as of how the device will be embedded in the clinical service.
HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)
Refine how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice
No dependencies
HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile
Refine a value proposition for the developed prototype highlighting benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions
No dependencies
HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)
Refine the conceptualisation of the health economics model and cost benefit analyses which will inform health economics data collection needs
No dependencies
Regulation (R) activities
The development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and use of a medical device are governed by a set of laws, standards and guidelines. These regulations are put in place to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical device.
R1: Research governance / Ethics
Gain ethical and research governance clearance (including sponsorship) for current and subsequent clinical studies
No dependencies
R3: Quality management system (ISO 13485 certification)
Obtain ISO 13485 Certification, and any other required ISO certificates (e.g. 27001). Relevant ISO standard include (but are not limited to) ISO 10993 (biological testing requirements), ISO 14644 (GMP manufacturing), ISO 14155 (GCP – good clinical practice), ISO-11137-2 ISO 11737 (sterilisation and validation of sterilisation), and ISO 14971 (risk management), ISO 20417 (information to be supplied by manufacturer), ISO 14630 (non active surgical implants), ISO 15223 (labelling), ISO 11607 (packaging), and ISO 20416 (post market surveillance.) Involve industry partners (e.g. manufacturer) as needed to obtain ISO certification.
No dependencies
R4: Clinical investigation approval
Refine and submit the technical file (e.g. design decisions, regulatory risk assessments, test methods) for MHRA approval for clinical investigation
- R&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)
R5: CE / UKCA marking
Start collecting clinical evidence on efficacy and safety for Regulatory compliance (e.g. CE/UKCA/FDA/Other), and if affecting clinical outcomes run the study to accepted good clinical practice (GCP) standards (e.g. ISO14155)
No dependencies
Productisation & Distribution (P&D) activities
The innovative technology needs to be manufactured into a regulated medical device product for it to be delivered to the end user (e.g. healthcare provider, patient). This process includes activities around quality control, packaging/labelling as well as distribution and sales.
P&D1: Manufacturing/software-engineering
Work with industry partners (including service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors- also considering start-up formation) to produce the final quality assured product, based on the final prototype, to be used in clinical setting
- R&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)
- R&D7: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care feasibility and efficacy
- R&D8: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care effectiveness
- R&D9: Freeze design
P&D2: Testing protocols
Develop testing protocols for the final quality assured product in a clinical setting
No dependencies
P&D3: Safety, compliance, interoperability and usability
Test compliance with technical file requirements (safety, compliance, interoperability and usability)
- P&D5: Scale-up
P&D4: Quality control
Conduct quality control of the product according to product specifications
- P&D5: Scale-up
P&D5: Scale-up
Scale up production and batch release (GMP compliant) for first in man clinical investigation
No dependencies
Business Model (BM) activities
A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.
BM4: Product vs service
Finalise the nature of the intervention within the clinical landscape and initialize plans for delivering device to market
No dependencies
BM5: Spinout vs licence
Finalise plans for potential academic exit strategies such as commercialisation venues (e.g. spin out vs license vs not-for-profit (e.g. via community interest company)) to position the proposed intervention within the clinical landscape
No dependencies
BM6: Business plan / canvas
Refine the business model (considering future requirements/steps, plan to seek for investors/funding for larger / pivotal / multisite clinical studies)
No dependencies
Health and Care Evaluation (HCE) activities
Health and care evaluation of a health technology innovation involves assessing its safety, efficacy and effectiveness. This assessment is necessary for regulatory approval of the innovation as medical device before it enters the market. It also includes ongoing monitoring of the device once it is being used in clinical practice.
HCE1: Critical evaluation of concept
Position of the concept within the competitive landscape and perform health & care risk assessment
No dependencies
HCE2: Health and care feasibility
Perform clinical evaluation of prototype in first in man, Phase I, clinical investigation study to assess feasibility and safety
- R4: Clinical investigation approval
HCE3: Health and care evaluation of safety and efficacy
Perform clinical evaluation of prototype clinical investigation study to assess feasibility, safety, and efficacy. This can be, but does not need to be, the same clinical investigation undertaken in HCE2
No dependencies
Potential funding sources
UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), Innovate UK, Internal translational funding calls, Companies, Venture capitalists
Deliverables
- Final product (frozen development/design)
- Submission of the revised technical file and obtain MHRA approval for clinical investigation
- Refine GMP manufacturing and release of batch for clinical testing
- Phase I, first in man, safety testing of GMP prototype in small cohorts (10-20) for preliminary feasibility, safety and efficacy assessment, and to inform larger study design
- Revised value proposition and target product profile
- Conceptual health economic model with preliminary data
- Relationships have been established with potential service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors
- Development process according to ISO13485
- Revised strategy for delivering the innovation to market (including academic exit strategy)
- Revised outline business model
- Evidence of utility in a health and care setting
Investigations that evaluate the proposed innovation in a health & care setting, providing actionable evidence of its efficacy, effectiveness and safety in a patient population.
[TRL 7]
Perform pivotal studies in larger cohorts to assess safety, efficacy, and effectiveness
Health Economics & Service Transformation (HEST) activities
The translation of a health technology innovation to a medical device used in clinical practice requires an understanding of the costs and benefits of the device as well as of how the device will be embedded in the clinical service.
HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)
Refine how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice based on your own data acquired in the clinical investigation
No dependencies
HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile
Refine the value proposition for the developed prototype by integrating your own data to highlight benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions
No dependencies
HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)
Refine health economics evaluation by integrating your own data to inform the cost benefit analyses
- HCE3: Health and care evaluation of safety and efficacy
- HCE4: Health and care validation of safety and efficacy, effectiveness
Regulation (R) activities
The development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and use of a medical device are governed by a set of laws, standards and guidelines. These regulations are put in place to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical device.
R1: Research governance / Ethics
Gain ethical and research governance clearance (including sponsorship) for current and subsequent clinical studies
No dependencies
R4: Clinical investigation approval
Seek approval for subsequent clinical studies. Notify Regulatory Authority (e.g. MHRA in the UK) of any design changes that might have occurred since the first clinical investigation approval
No dependencies
R5: CE / UKCA marking
Refine the technical file for Regulatory Compliance (e.g. CE/UKCA/FDA/Other) (e.g. design decisions, risk assessments, test methods) (engaging notified body)
No dependencies
Productisation & Distribution (P&D) activities
The innovative technology needs to be manufactured into a regulated medical device product for it to be delivered to the end user (e.g. healthcare provider, patient). This process includes activities around quality control, packaging/labelling as well as distribution and sales.
P&D3: Safety, compliance, interoperability and usability
Test compliance with technical file requirements (safety, compliance, interoperability and usability)
- P&D5: Scale-up
P&D4: Quality control
Conduct quality control of the product according to product specifications
- P&D5: Scale-up
P&D5: Scale-up
Increase manufacturing (if needed) for the larger clinical investigation studies
No dependencies
Business Model (BM) activities
A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.
BM4: Product vs service
Review commercial strategy to deliver the device to market (consider refinements of the product/service)
No dependencies
BM5: Spinout vs licence
Review commercial strategy including the academic exit strategy (e.g. spinout vs license)
No dependencies
BM6: Business plan / canvas
Refine business model to implement future steps
No dependencies
BM7: Investment required and RoI
Assess the commercial viability of the product to confirm that the manufacturing, distribution and marketing of the device is financially sustainable (including return-on-investment analysis); seek company or venture capitalist funding
No dependencies
Health and Care Evaluation (HCE) activities
Health and care evaluation of a health technology innovation involves assessing its safety, efficacy and effectiveness. This assessment is necessary for regulatory approval of the innovation as medical device before it enters the market. It also includes ongoing monitoring of the device once it is being used in clinical practice.
HCE3: Health and care evaluation of safety and efficacy
Conduct large scale clinical investigation study in relevant patient groups to validate safety and efficacy of the device
- R4: Clinical investigation approval
HCE4: Health and care validation of safety and efficacy, effectiveness
Larger scale / pivotal / multisite clinical investigation study in relevant patient groups to validate safety, efficacy and effectiveness of the device. Write a clinical evaluation report (CER) summarising the clinical outcomes of the clinical investigations for inclusion in technical file to notified body.
- R4: Clinical investigation approval
HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch
Initialise plans for post-market surveillance to include in technical plan and clinical follow up
No dependencies
Potential funding sources
UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), Innovate UK, Internal translational funding calls, Companies, Venture capitalists
Deliverables
- Clinical assessment of feasibility, safety and efficacy in large clinical investigation study
- Clinical validation of safety, efficacy, and effectiveness in a larger/pivotal clinical study
- Partnerships have been formed with key stakeholders (e.g. suppliers, service providers, manufacturers, distributors / customers)
- Clinical Evaluation Report (CER)
Activities that finalise the regulatory approvals, and the commercialisation, implementation and scaling-up strategies for the health & care innovation.
[TRL 8]
Obtaining Regulatory approvals; service transformation modelling and health economics modelling to prove benefit of device; development of business plan to attract funding for launch and adoption into market.
Health Economics & Service Transformation (HEST) activities
The translation of a health technology innovation to a medical device used in clinical practice requires an understanding of the costs and benefits of the device as well as of how the device will be embedded in the clinical service.
HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)
Finalise how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice (health & care pathway based on your own data acquired in the clinical investigation
No dependencies
HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile
Finalise the value proposition for the developed prototype by integrating your own data to highlight benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions
- HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)
- HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)
HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)
Finalising full Health economics evaluation and cost benefit analyses
No dependencies
HEST7: End-user business model / Procurement case
Define the end user-business model / procurement case
No dependencies
HEST8: NICE Health Technology Evaluation
Consider adoption of the product into policy and/or guidelines as a routine method or approach; NICE Health Technology Evaluation (Early Evaluation Assessment)
No dependencies
Regulation (R) activities
The development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and use of a medical device are governed by a set of laws, standards and guidelines. These regulations are put in place to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical device.
R5: CE / UKCA marking
Finalise and submit technical file (e.g. design decisions, risk assessments, clinical evaluation report) for CE marking (EU) or UKCA marking (UK only)
- HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch
Productisation & Distribution (P&D) activities
The innovative technology needs to be manufactured into a regulated medical device product for it to be delivered to the end user (e.g. healthcare provider, patient). This process includes activities around quality control, packaging/labelling as well as distribution and sales.
P&D5: Scale-up
Increase manufacturing for future commercialisation / industry adoption following quality assurance processes to ensure safety and compliance with product specifications. If changes in manufacturing are needed, further regulatory approvals might be required.
No dependencies
Business Model (BM) activities
A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.
BM6: Business plan / canvas
Finalise and implement the chosen full business model
No dependencies
BM7: Investment required and RoI
Confirm commercial viability of the product; seek company or venture capitalist funding
No dependencies
BM8: Marketing and promotion
Refine sales and marketing strategy based on business model
No dependencies
Health and Care Evaluation (HCE) activities
Health and care evaluation of a health technology innovation involves assessing its safety, efficacy and effectiveness. This assessment is necessary for regulatory approval of the innovation as medical device before it enters the market. It also includes ongoing monitoring of the device once it is being used in clinical practice.
HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch
Refine and finalise plans for post-market surveillance to include in technical plan and clinical follow up
No dependencies
Potential funding sources
NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), Horizon Europe, other charities including condition-specific charities, internal translational funding calls, companies, venture capitalists
Deliverables
- Increase manufacturing for industry adoption
- Finalised value proposition and target product profile
- Full health economic analysis
- Full business model
- Clinical evaluation report
- Finalised technical file (including revised regulatory risk assessment) for Regulatory Approval (e.g. CE/UKCA/FDA/Other)
- Product ready for deployment
- Sales and marketing plan
- Post-market surveillance plan / Post-market Clinical Follow-up plan.
Activities that lead to product launch, and evaluation of the real-world effectiveness and safety of the innovation, to avoid harm and inform future developments.
[TRL 9]
Collecting real-world evidence, monitor long term safety, efficacy and usage of the device in the general population. This might inform future improvements of the product which might require additional regulatory approvals.
Health Economics & Service Transformation (HEST) activities
The translation of a health technology innovation to a medical device used in clinical practice requires an understanding of the costs and benefits of the device as well as of how the device will be embedded in the clinical service.
HEST7: End-user business model / Procurement case
Monitor the end user-business model / procurement case (e.g. product adoption and effect on service post market); ongoing health economic analysis
No dependencies
HEST8: NICE Health Technology Evaluation
Obtaining NICE Health Technology Evaluation recommendation
No dependencies
Regulation (R) activities
The development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and use of a medical device are governed by a set of laws, standards and guidelines. These regulations are put in place to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical device.
R6: Post-market surveillance (PMS) and post-market clinical follow up (PMCF)
Collate post market post-market clinical evidence; update clinical evaluation report annually and maintain quality management system
- HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch
Productisation & Distribution (P&D) activities
The innovative technology needs to be manufactured into a regulated medical device product for it to be delivered to the end user (e.g. healthcare provider, patient). This process includes activities around quality control, packaging/labelling as well as distribution and sales.
P&D5: Scale-up
Ensure that manufacturing is performed at a scale which meets with market demand, or further increase manufacturing output if required. If changes in manufacturing are needed, further regulatory approvals might be required.
- P&D6: Production and distribution
P&D6: Production and distribution
Product launch and distribution (including strategies for communication and training processes to increase acceptability by end users)
No dependencies
Business Model (BM) activities
A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.
BM8: Marketing and promotion
Market and promote of device on new markets
No dependencies
Health and Care Evaluation (HCE) activities
Health and care evaluation of a health technology innovation involves assessing its safety, efficacy and effectiveness. This assessment is necessary for regulatory approval of the innovation as medical device before it enters the market. It also includes ongoing monitoring of the device once it is being used in clinical practice.
HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch
Real world evidence post launch (Phase 4); Post-market surveillance and post-market clinical follow-up of the product to collect data on long-term effectiveness, potential adverse effects, and usage of the device
No dependencies
Potential funding sources
NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), companies, venture capitalists
Deliverables
- Product launch, adoption and monitoring
- End-user business model / procurement case
- NICE Health Technology Evaluation recommendation (if appropriate)
- Updated clinical evaluation report (CER) with post-market surveillance data and post-market clinical follow-up data.