Implantable/Invasive Medical Device

This roadmap describes the journey of implantable/invasive medical devices from basic research, concept development down to clinical testing and entry to market. Each device is different but this toolkit provides guidance on what to expect when developing invasive medical devices in an academic setting.


Stakeholders Stakeholders Stakeholders Stakeholders Stakeholders Stakeholders Stakeholders Stakeholders
  • D1
  • Basic Research
  • Basic research that generates new knowledge, insights, methods or technologies, but has no immediate health & care application.
    [TRL 1]

  • D2
  • Strategic Research
  • Research that addresses a class of health & care problems, developing knowledge, insights, methods or technologies that may underpin innovative solutions.
    [TRL 1]

  • D3
  • Concept Development
  • Research that draws on existing knowledge, insights, methods or technologies to develop the concept for an innovative solution to a specific health & care problem.
    [TRL 2]

  • D4
  • Prototype Development & Technical Feasibility
  • Research that develops the proposed health & care innovation and provides initial evidence for the feasibility of the proposed innovation.
    [TRL 3, 4]

  • T1
  • Product Development & Healthcare Feasibility
  • Research that further develops the proposed health & care innovation and provides reproducible evidence for its efficacy and safety in a relevant environment.
    [TRL 5, 6]

  • T2
  • Product Testing & Proof-of-value
  • Investigations that evaluate the proposed innovation in a health & care setting, providing actionable evidence of its efficacy, effectiveness and safety in a patient population.
    [TRL 7]

  • T3
  • Regulatory Approvals & Route-to-market
  • Activities that finalise the regulatory approvals, and the commercialisation, implementation and scaling-up strategies for the health & care innovation.
    [TRL 8]

  • T4
  • Product Launch & Real-world Learning
  • Activities that lead to product launch, and evaluation of the real-world effectiveness and safety of the innovation, to avoid harm and inform future developments.
    [TRL 9]

D1: Basic Research

Basic research that generates new knowledge, insights, methods or technologies, but has no immediate health & care application.
[TRL 1]


Developing novel methods and materials not targeted at a specific health & care application and not for human use

  • R&D1:

    Develop generic methods and technology including assessments of biological relevance and indications of biocompatibility

    Stakeholders

    R&D1: Basic/generic research

    keep informed
    • Public partners
    have to involve
    • Funders
  • BM1:

    Understand IP management and contract-related research disclosure agreements

    Stakeholders

    BM1: Intellectual property and branding

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
Potential funding sources

UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Leverhulme Trust, Royal Society, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities, Companies, internal pump priming schemes

Deliverables
  • Generic methods, technology, or materials with indicative evidence of performance (biologically relevant but not for human use).
  • For novel materials, characterisation of the materials system properties and performance in non-biological systems.

D2: Strategic Research

Research that addresses a class of health & care problems, developing knowledge, insights, methods or technologies that may underpin innovative solutions.
[TRL 1]


Developing methods and materials to address a specific health & care clinical need (or class of)

  • R&D1:

    Develop generic methods and technology of device components, following good laboratory practice (GLP) principles and accurate / detailed record keeping

    Stakeholders

    R&D1: Basic/generic research

    keep informed
    • Public partners
    have to involve
    • Funders
  • R&D2:

    Perform scientific literature review; applied methods and technology development based on available health & care data to identify potential application areas within biological environment, understand biocompatibility, toxicity issues , and biodegradability (if applicable)

    Stakeholders

    R&D2: Requirements and prior knowledge

    have to involve
    • HC professional
    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    keep informed
    • Research Innovation System
  • HEST1:

    Identify potential areas for current and foreseeable healthcare applications

    Stakeholders

    HEST1: Healthcare context (e.g. problem addressed, scale, current QALY/£ cost)

    may or may not involve
    • HC professional
    • Industry
    • Potential end users
    keep informed
    • Public partners
    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
  • R1:

    Consider regulatory approval and other governance issues (e.g. MTAs, HTA) for in vitro and in vivo testing of the material and understanding ethical approvals for testing of medical devices in clinical investigations (including contracts and sponsorship).

    Stakeholders

    R1: Research governance / Ethics

    have to involve
    • Study sponsor
    may or may not involve
    • HC professional
    • Public partners
  • BM1:

    Consider IP protection (e.g. patenting), record funding and contracts for IP ownership

    Stakeholders

    BM1: Intellectual property and branding

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
Potential funding sources

UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Leverhulme Trust, Royal Society, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, Internal translational funding calls, Companies

Deliverables
  • Understanding of potential use in healthcare setting
  • Understanding of issues around biocompatibility, toxicity, and efficacy in biological systems
  • Finding / creating indicative evidence from literature or early studies on performance
  • Initiate IP protection if applicable

D3: Concept Development

Research that draws on existing knowledge, insights, methods or technologies to develop the concept for an innovative solution to a specific health & care problem.
[TRL 2]


Reaching out to stakeholders from STEM, applied health research and clinical practice to provide insights necessary todesign and develop an innovative concept/device for addressing a specific health & care problem.

  • R&D2:

    Record device requirements, prior knowledge, and evidence of a valid clinical association to inform device specification

    Stakeholders

    R&D2: Requirements and prior knowledge

    have to involve
    • HC professional
    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    keep informed
    • Research Innovation System
  • R&D3:

    Prototype design and development (not for human use). Assess efficacy in preclinical models (in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo – small and large animal models)

    Stakeholders

    R&D3: Concept development and refinement leading to prototype

    have to involve
    • Public partners
    • HC professional
    may or may not involve
    • Industry
    • Potential end users
    keep informed
    • Funders
    • Research Innovation System
  • R&D4:

    Consider human factors that can influence concept design and development (e.g. will the device need removing? what are the consequences if not?)

    Stakeholders

    R&D4: Human factors

    have to involve
    • Potential end users
    • Public partners
    • Clinical champions
    keep informed
    • HC professional
  • R&D5:

    Consider responsible innovation, including potential effects on the environment, that can influence concept design and development

    Stakeholders

    R&D5: Responsible innovation

    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
    may or may not involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    • Potential end users
    • Industry
    keep informed
    • Public partners
    • HC professional
  • HEST1:

    Understand current and foreseeable specific health & care need

    Stakeholders

    HEST1: Healthcare context (e.g. problem addressed, scale, current QALY/£ cost)

    may or may not involve
    • HC professional
    • Industry
    • Potential end users
    keep informed
    • Public partners
    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
  • HEST2:

    Understand current and foreseeable clinical care pathway and guidelines of care for the specific clinical need

    Stakeholders

    HEST2: Current clinical care pathway (guidelines)

    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
    keep informed
    • HC professional
  • HEST3:

    Understand current and foreseeable clinical care workflow and current gold standard of care for the specific clinical need

    Stakeholders

    HEST3: Real-world evaluation of clinical care pathway (delivery)

    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
    • HC professional
    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    • Clinical champions
    • Industry
  • HEST4:

    Understand on how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice

    Stakeholders

    HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)

    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    have to involve
    • Clinical champions
    • Research Innovation System
  • HEST5:

    Prepare initial target product profile to define an outline of the value proposition – what is the expected benefit of the device in terms of costs, patient care. Consider competing solutions (existing or currently under development) which might impact the clinical need, guidance, workflows or pathways. This will be needed for funding applications and the technical file.

    Stakeholders

    HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile

    may or may not involve
    • Commissioners
    • Clinical champions
    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • R2: Intended use and device categorisation
  • HEST6:

    Conceptualise health economics evaluation and cost benefit analyses (“desk research”, literature review) and conceptualise a preliminary health economic model which will inform concept development (considering current and upcoming competing solutions).

    Stakeholders

    HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)

    have to involve
    • Commissioners
    • Research Innovation System
    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
  • R1:

    Arrange ethical approvals (including sponsorship) for suitable (pre)clinical testing of concept

    Stakeholders

    R1: Research governance / Ethics

    have to involve
    • Study sponsor
    may or may not involve
    • HC professional
    • Public partners
  • R2:

    Formalise intended use (based on HEST2/3); Understanding of device regulations and risk classification to inform concept development (including identification of regulatory steps needed for future clinical testing)

    Stakeholders

    R2: Intended use and device categorisation

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    • Study sponsor
    • Research Innovation System
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • HEST2: Current clinical care pathway (guidelines)
    • HEST3: Real-world evaluation of clinical care pathway (delivery)
  • R3:

    Understand the requirements for accurate audit trail / traceability of prototype device development is in place through a quality management system.

    Stakeholders

    R3: Quality management system (ISO 13485 certification)

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
  • P&D1:

    Development of prototype and design initial production process (not for human use) with view to adapt (for human use) and scaling up considering regulatory implications for clinical investigations.

    Stakeholders

    P&D1: Manufacturing/software-engineering

    have to involve
    • Funders
    • Potential end users
    • Regulatory advisors
    • Industry
    may or may not involve
    • Clinical champions
    • Public partners
    • HC professional
  • BM1:

    Consider additional IP protection based on concept development (could include design and manufacturing processes), consider freedom to operate; record funding and contracts for IP ownership.

    Stakeholders

    BM1: Intellectual property and branding

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • BM2:

    Understand the market and its size to determine commercial opportunities and potential economic impact

    Stakeholders

    BM2: Market size (UK, Worldwide)

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
    • Industry
  • BM3:

    Understand of potential market share based on competing solutions and analysis of competitors

    Stakeholders

    BM3: Market share (realistic assumptions)

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • BM4:

    Understand on the nature of the intervention within the clinical landscape and consider plans for delivering device to market

    Stakeholders

    BM4: Product vs service

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
    • Industry
  • BM5:

    Understand potential exit strategies such as commercialisation venues (e.g. spin out vs license vs not-for-profit (e.g. via community interest company) )

    Stakeholders

    BM5: Spinout vs licence

    have to involve
    • Industry
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • HCE1:

    Collect patient and end user feedback of concept

    Stakeholders

    HCE1: Critical evaluation of concept

    have to involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    • Research Innovation System
    keep informed
    • HC professional
Potential funding sources

UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Internal translational funding calls, Companies.

Deliverables
  • Clearly articulated health & care need
  • Solution concept and prototype device manufacturing including plans for scaling up production with clinically relevant methods.
  • Draft of intended use statement
  • Draft of initial value proposition and target product profile
  • Ethical approval ready for preclinical testing in D4 (small and/or large animal models)
  • Initial indications of market potential / opportunity (including product/market fit)

D4: Prototype Development & Technical Feasibility

Research that develops the proposed health & care innovation and provides initial evidence for the feasibility of the proposed innovation.
[TRL 3, 4]


Obtain proof of concept of feasibility and efficacy of the prototype device in preclinical model(s). This may be an iterative process that requires testing of multiple different prototypes

  • R&D3:

    Full prototype (human use) development, manufacture at good manufacturing practice (GMP) level, and complete pre-clinical testing

    Stakeholders

    R&D3: Concept development and refinement leading to prototype

    have to involve
    • Public partners
    • HC professional
    may or may not involve
    • Industry
    • Potential end users
    keep informed
    • Funders
    • Research Innovation System
  • R&D4:

    Include human centric design principles in prototype

    Stakeholders

    R&D4: Human factors

    have to involve
    • Potential end users
    • Public partners
    • Clinical champions
    keep informed
    • HC professional
  • R&D5:

    Ensure prototype design meets regulatory and GMP manufacturing requirements, is sustainable in design, is sourced from ethically verified materials and its manufacture is auditable. This can be performed by external industry partner/ test house

    Stakeholders

    R&D5: Responsible innovation

    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
    may or may not involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    • Potential end users
    • Industry
    keep informed
    • Public partners
    • HC professional
  • R&D6:

    Determine if biocompatibility / toxicity / biodegradability and formulation of prototype device with methods and materials that are suitable for (human) use in a clinical setting and compare to current clinical solutions. This can be performed by external industry partner/ test house

    Stakeholders

    R&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)

    have to involve
    • HC professional
    • Clinical champions
    • Funders
    • Potential end users
    may or may not involve
    • Industry
    • Public partners
  • R&D7:

    Adapt prototype based on pre-clinical data and key stakeholder feedback to ensure health and care feasibility will be achieved (design input)

    Stakeholders

    R&D7: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care feasibility and efficacy

    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    may or may not involve
    • Clinical champions
    keep informed
    • HC professional
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • HCE1: Critical evaluation of concept
  • HEST4:

    Review how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice

    Stakeholders

    HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)

    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    have to involve
    • Clinical champions
    • Research Innovation System
  • HEST5:

    Review the value proposition for the developed prototype highlighting benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions.

    Stakeholders

    HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile

    may or may not involve
    • Commissioners
    • Clinical champions
    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
  • HEST6:

    Review the conceptualised health economics model and cost benefit analyses which will inform on what data needs to be collected.

    Stakeholders

    HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)

    have to involve
    • Commissioners
    • Research Innovation System
    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
  • R1:

    Prepare ethics and research governance applications (including sponsorship) for clinical investigations / feasibility studies in T1 – T4 stages

    Stakeholders

    R1: Research governance / Ethics

    have to involve
    • Study sponsor
    may or may not involve
    • HC professional
    • Public partners
  • R2:

    Determine device categorisation and necessary regulatory approvals required.

    Stakeholders

    R2: Intended use and device categorisation

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    • Study sponsor
    • Research Innovation System
  • R3:

    Ensure accurate audit trail / traceability of prototype device development (inc. device materials, design iterations and equipment uses) is in place for example by working through a quality management system (ISO13485)

    Stakeholders

    R3: Quality management system (ISO 13485 certification)

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
  • R4:

    Initialise a technical file (incl risk assessment), determine the documentation required for MHRA notification for clinical investigation approval

    Stakeholders

    R4: Clinical investigation approval

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    • HC professional
    • Potential end users
    • Study sponsor
    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
  • R5:

    Understand the requirements for Regulatory Approvals (e.g. CE / UKCA / FDA / other). Ensure requirements for clinical investigation standards are met.

    Stakeholders

    R5: CE / UKCA marking

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    may or may not involve
    • Industry
  • P&D1:

    Optimise the full prototype (if applicable) for human use and refine production methods for preclinical testing. Seek industry partners (including service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors - also considering start-up formation)

    Stakeholders

    P&D1: Manufacturing/software-engineering

    have to involve
    • Funders
    • Potential end users
    • Regulatory advisors
    • Industry
    may or may not involve
    • Clinical champions
    • Public partners
    • HC professional
  • P&D2:

    Develop testing protocols for the full prototype in pre-clinical models and understanding of protocols for the final product required for clinical investigations.

    Stakeholders

    P&D2: Testing protocols

    have to involve
    • Industry
  • P&D3:

    Test compliance with technical file requirements (safety, compliance, interoperability and usability)

    Stakeholders

    P&D3: Safety, compliance, interoperability and usability

    have to involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    • Regulatory advisors
    may or may not involve
    • Industry
    • HC professional
    keep informed
    • Clinical champions
  • P&D4:

    Conduct quality control of the prototype according to product specifications

    Stakeholders

    P&D4: Quality control

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
  • BM2:

    Identify market (i.e. target payer vs user), refine market size analysis to determine if there is a viable market

    Stakeholders

    BM2: Market size (UK, Worldwide)

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
    • Industry
  • BM3:

    Refine market share analysis including analysis of competitors and opportunities and Finalise market share assumptions to feed into HEST4

    Stakeholders

    BM3: Market share (realistic assumptions)

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • BM4:

    Start defining the nature of the intervention within the clinical landscape and initialize plans for delivering device to market

    Stakeholders

    BM4: Product vs service

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
    • Industry
  • BM5:

    Start Exploring potential exit strategies such as commercialisation venues (e.g. spin out vs license vs not-for-profit (e.g. via community interest company))

    Stakeholders

    BM5: Spinout vs licence

    have to involve
    • Industry
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • BM6:

    Draft an outline of the business model (considering future requirements/steps, plan to seek for investors/funding for larger / pivotal / multisite clinical studies)

    Stakeholders

    BM6: Business plan / canvas

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • HCE1:

    Evaluate prototype in the competitive landscape based on pre-clinical studies (i.e. how does the prototype compare to gold standard). Create a clinical evaluation plan (CEP) to define the scope and outline the systematic approach of the planned clinical investigation to demonstrate scientific, analytical and clinical validity

    Stakeholders

    HCE1: Critical evaluation of concept

    have to involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    • Research Innovation System
    keep informed
    • HC professional
Potential funding sources

UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Innovate UK, Internal translational funding calls, Companies

Deliverables
  • Full functional prototype (for human use) with indicative evidence of performance in relevant preclinical models
  • Obtain safety testing certification for full prototype
  • Auditable records available (e.g. QMS) for device component manufacturing and device testing.
  • Revised value proposition and target product profile
  • Finalised intended use statement
  • Potential service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors have been identified
  • Revised summary of market opportunity (demonstrating commercial feasibility and competitiveness)
  • Proposed strategy for delivering the innovation to market (including academic exit strategy)
  • Initial outline business model
  • Initial regulatory risk assessment
  • Initial technical file
  • Clinical evaluation plan

T1: Product Development & Healthcare Feasibility

Research that further develops the proposed health & care innovation and provides reproducible evidence for its efficacy and safety in a relevant environment.
[TRL 5, 6]


Perform feasibility studies in clinical setting (Phase I, first in man study) with refined prototype to generate evidence of health & care relevance and safety in a realistic but controlled health & care setting. This may be an iterative process that requires testing of multiple different prototypes before committing to the final design

  • R&D6:

    Refine the final prototype for use in a small scale, first in man, feasibility study on small patient groups for usability, safety testing and considerations of efficacy

    Stakeholders

    R&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)

    have to involve
    • HC professional
    • Clinical champions
    • Funders
    • Potential end users
    may or may not involve
    • Industry
    • Public partners
  • R&D7:

    Adapt prototype based on preliminary clinical data and key stakeholder feedback to ensure health and care feasibility and efficacy will be achieved (design input)

    Stakeholders

    R&D7: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care feasibility and efficacy

    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    may or may not involve
    • Clinical champions
    keep informed
    • HC professional
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • HCE2: Health and care feasibility
    • R4: Clinical investigation approval
  • R&D8:

    Refine the prototype to ensure health and care effectiveness will be achieved

    Stakeholders

    R&D8: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care effectiveness

    have to involve
    • Clinical champions
    • Public partners
    • Research Innovation System
    • Potential end users
    keep informed
    • HC professional
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • HCE2: Health and care feasibility
  • R&D9:

    Completion of R&D activities including the creation of the Device Master List (DML, detailing all processes required to create the device; to include in the technical file) and freeze of the design of the refined product.

    Stakeholders

    R&D9: Freeze design

    may or may not involve
    • Industry
    keep informed
    • Potential end users
    • Public partners
    • HC professional
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • HCE2: Health and care feasibility
  • HEST4:

    Refine how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice

    Stakeholders

    HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)

    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    have to involve
    • Clinical champions
    • Research Innovation System
  • HEST5:

    Refine a value proposition for the developed prototype highlighting benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions

    Stakeholders

    HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile

    may or may not involve
    • Commissioners
    • Clinical champions
    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
  • HEST6:

    Refine the conceptualisation of the health economics model and cost benefit analyses which will inform health economics data collection needs

    Stakeholders

    HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)

    have to involve
    • Commissioners
    • Research Innovation System
    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
  • R1:

    Gain ethical and research governance clearance (including sponsorship) for current and subsequent clinical studies

    Stakeholders

    R1: Research governance / Ethics

    have to involve
    • Study sponsor
    may or may not involve
    • HC professional
    • Public partners
  • R3:

    Obtain ISO 13485 Certification, and any other required ISO certificates (e.g. 27001). Relevant ISO standard include (but are not limited to) ISO 10993 (biological testing requirements), ISO 14644 (GMP manufacturing), ISO 14155 (GCP – good clinical practice), ISO-11137-2 ISO 11737 (sterilisation and validation of sterilisation), and ISO 14971 (risk management), ISO 20417 (information to be supplied by manufacturer), ISO 14630 (non active surgical implants), ISO 15223 (labelling), ISO 11607 (packaging), and ISO 20416 (post market surveillance.) Involve industry partners (e.g. manufacturer) as needed to obtain ISO certification.

    Stakeholders

    R3: Quality management system (ISO 13485 certification)

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
  • R4:

    Refine and submit the technical file (e.g. design decisions, regulatory risk assessments, test methods) for MHRA approval for clinical investigation

    Stakeholders

    R4: Clinical investigation approval

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    • HC professional
    • Potential end users
    • Study sponsor
    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • R&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)
  • R5:

    Start collecting clinical evidence on efficacy and safety for Regulatory compliance (e.g. CE/UKCA/FDA/Other), and if affecting clinical outcomes run the study to accepted good clinical practice (GCP) standards (e.g. ISO14155)

    Stakeholders

    R5: CE / UKCA marking

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    may or may not involve
    • Industry
  • P&D1:

    Work with industry partners (including service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors- also considering start-up formation) to produce the final quality assured product, based on the final prototype, to be used in clinical setting

    Stakeholders

    P&D1: Manufacturing/software-engineering

    have to involve
    • Funders
    • Potential end users
    • Regulatory advisors
    • Industry
    may or may not involve
    • Clinical champions
    • Public partners
    • HC professional
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • R&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)
    • R&D7: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care feasibility and efficacy
    • R&D8: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care effectiveness
    • R&D9: Freeze design
  • P&D2:

    Develop testing protocols for the final quality assured product in a clinical setting

    Stakeholders

    P&D2: Testing protocols

    have to involve
    • Industry
  • P&D3:

    Test compliance with technical file requirements (safety, compliance, interoperability and usability)

    Stakeholders

    P&D3: Safety, compliance, interoperability and usability

    have to involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    • Regulatory advisors
    may or may not involve
    • Industry
    • HC professional
    keep informed
    • Clinical champions
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • P&D5: Scale-up
  • P&D4:

    Conduct quality control of the product according to product specifications

    Stakeholders

    P&D4: Quality control

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • P&D5: Scale-up
  • P&D5:

    Scale up production and batch release (GMP compliant) for first in man clinical investigation

    Stakeholders

    P&D5: Scale-up

    keep informed
    • Research Innovation System
    • Funders
    have to involve
    • Industry
  • BM4:

    Finalise the nature of the intervention within the clinical landscape and initialize plans for delivering device to market

    Stakeholders

    BM4: Product vs service

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
    • Industry
  • BM5:

    Finalise plans for potential academic exit strategies such as commercialisation venues (e.g. spin out vs license vs not-for-profit (e.g. via community interest company)) to position the proposed intervention within the clinical landscape

    Stakeholders

    BM5: Spinout vs licence

    have to involve
    • Industry
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • BM6:

    Refine the business model (considering future requirements/steps, plan to seek for investors/funding for larger / pivotal / multisite clinical studies)

    Stakeholders

    BM6: Business plan / canvas

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • HCE1:

    Position of the concept within the competitive landscape and perform health & care risk assessment

    Stakeholders

    HCE1: Critical evaluation of concept

    have to involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    • Research Innovation System
    keep informed
    • HC professional
  • HCE2:

    Perform clinical evaluation of prototype in first in man, Phase I, clinical investigation study to assess feasibility and safety

    Stakeholders

    HCE2: Health and care feasibility

    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
    • HC professional
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    may or may not involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    • Clinical champions
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • R4: Clinical investigation approval
  • HCE3:

    Perform clinical evaluation of prototype clinical investigation study to assess feasibility, safety, and efficacy. This can be, but does not need to be, the same clinical investigation undertaken in HCE2

    Stakeholders

    HCE3: Health and care evaluation of safety and efficacy

    have to involve
    • Potential end users
    • Public partners
    • Research Innovation System
    • Regulatory advisors
    • HC professional
    • Clinical champions
Potential funding sources

UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), Innovate UK, Internal translational funding calls, Companies, Venture capitalists

Deliverables
  • Final product (frozen development/design)
  • Submission of the revised technical file and obtain MHRA approval for clinical investigation
  • Refine GMP manufacturing and release of batch for clinical testing
  • Phase I, first in man, safety testing of GMP prototype in small cohorts (10-20) for preliminary feasibility, safety and efficacy assessment, and to inform larger study design
  • Revised value proposition and target product profile
  • Conceptual health economic model with preliminary data
  • Relationships have been established with potential service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors
  • Development process according to ISO13485
  • Revised strategy for delivering the innovation to market (including academic exit strategy)
  • Revised outline business model
  • Evidence of utility in a health and care setting

T2: Product Testing & Proof-of-value

Investigations that evaluate the proposed innovation in a health & care setting, providing actionable evidence of its efficacy, effectiveness and safety in a patient population.
[TRL 7]


Perform pivotal studies in larger cohorts to assess safety, efficacy, and effectiveness

  • HEST4:

    Refine how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice based on your own data acquired in the clinical investigation

    Stakeholders

    HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)

    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    have to involve
    • Clinical champions
    • Research Innovation System
  • HEST5:

    Refine the value proposition for the developed prototype by integrating your own data to highlight benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions

    Stakeholders

    HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile

    may or may not involve
    • Commissioners
    • Clinical champions
    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
  • HEST6:

    Refine health economics evaluation by integrating your own data to inform the cost benefit analyses

    Stakeholders

    HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)

    have to involve
    • Commissioners
    • Research Innovation System
    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • HCE3: Health and care evaluation of safety and efficacy
    • HCE4: Health and care validation of safety and efficacy, effectiveness
  • R1:

    Gain ethical and research governance clearance (including sponsorship) for current and subsequent clinical studies

    Stakeholders

    R1: Research governance / Ethics

    have to involve
    • Study sponsor
    may or may not involve
    • HC professional
    • Public partners
  • R4:

    Seek approval for subsequent clinical studies. Notify Regulatory Authority (e.g. MHRA in the UK) of any design changes that might have occurred since the first clinical investigation approval

    Stakeholders

    R4: Clinical investigation approval

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    • HC professional
    • Potential end users
    • Study sponsor
    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
  • R5:

    Refine the technical file for Regulatory Compliance (e.g. CE/UKCA/FDA/Other) (e.g. design decisions, risk assessments, test methods) (engaging notified body)

    Stakeholders

    R5: CE / UKCA marking

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    may or may not involve
    • Industry
  • P&D3:

    Test compliance with technical file requirements (safety, compliance, interoperability and usability)

    Stakeholders

    P&D3: Safety, compliance, interoperability and usability

    have to involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    • Regulatory advisors
    may or may not involve
    • Industry
    • HC professional
    keep informed
    • Clinical champions
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • P&D5: Scale-up
  • P&D4:

    Conduct quality control of the product according to product specifications

    Stakeholders

    P&D4: Quality control

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • P&D5: Scale-up
  • P&D5:

    Increase manufacturing (if needed) for the larger clinical investigation studies

    Stakeholders

    P&D5: Scale-up

    keep informed
    • Research Innovation System
    • Funders
    have to involve
    • Industry
  • BM4:

    Review commercial strategy to deliver the device to market (consider refinements of the product/service)

    Stakeholders

    BM4: Product vs service

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
    • Industry
  • BM5:

    Review commercial strategy including the academic exit strategy (e.g. spinout vs license)

    Stakeholders

    BM5: Spinout vs licence

    have to involve
    • Industry
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • BM6:

    Refine business model to implement future steps

    Stakeholders

    BM6: Business plan / canvas

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • BM7:

    Assess the commercial viability of the product to confirm that the manufacturing, distribution and marketing of the device is financially sustainable (including return-on-investment analysis); seek company or venture capitalist funding

    Stakeholders

    BM7: Investment required and RoI

    have to involve
    • Funders
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • HCE3:

    Conduct large scale clinical investigation study in relevant patient groups to validate safety and efficacy of the device

    Stakeholders

    HCE3: Health and care evaluation of safety and efficacy

    have to involve
    • Potential end users
    • Public partners
    • Research Innovation System
    • Regulatory advisors
    • HC professional
    • Clinical champions
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • R4: Clinical investigation approval
  • HCE4:

    Larger scale / pivotal / multisite clinical investigation study in relevant patient groups to validate safety, efficacy and effectiveness of the device. Write a clinical evaluation report (CER) summarising the clinical outcomes of the clinical investigations for inclusion in technical file to notified body.

    Stakeholders

    HCE4: Health and care validation of safety and efficacy, effectiveness

    have to involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    • Research Innovation System
    • Regulatory advisors
    • HC professional
    • Clinical champions
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • R4: Clinical investigation approval
  • HCE5:

    Initialise plans for post-market surveillance to include in technical plan and clinical follow up

    Stakeholders

    HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    • Clinical champions
    • Potential end users
    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    • Research Innovation System
    • HC professional
    keep informed
    • Funders
Potential funding sources

UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), Innovate UK, Internal translational funding calls, Companies, Venture capitalists

Deliverables
  • Clinical assessment of feasibility, safety and efficacy in large clinical investigation study
  • Clinical validation of safety, efficacy, and effectiveness in a larger/pivotal clinical study
  • Partnerships have been formed with key stakeholders (e.g. suppliers, service providers, manufacturers, distributors / customers)
  • Clinical Evaluation Report (CER)

T3: Regulatory Approvals & Route-to-market

Activities that finalise the regulatory approvals, and the commercialisation, implementation and scaling-up strategies for the health & care innovation.
[TRL 8]


Obtaining Regulatory approvals; service transformation modelling and health economics modelling to prove benefit of device; development of business plan to attract funding for launch and adoption into market.

  • HEST4:

    Finalise how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice (health & care pathway based on your own data acquired in the clinical investigation

    Stakeholders

    HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)

    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
    have to involve
    • Clinical champions
    • Research Innovation System
  • HEST5:

    Finalise the value proposition for the developed prototype by integrating your own data to highlight benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions

    Stakeholders

    HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile

    may or may not involve
    • Commissioners
    • Clinical champions
    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)
    • HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)
  • HEST6:

    Finalising full Health economics evaluation and cost benefit analyses

    Stakeholders

    HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)

    have to involve
    • Commissioners
    • Research Innovation System
    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    • Potential end users
  • HEST7:

    Define the end user-business model / procurement case

    Stakeholders

    HEST7: End-user business model / Procurement case

    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
    • Commissioners
    keep informed
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • HEST8:

    Consider adoption of the product into policy and/or guidelines as a routine method or approach; NICE Health Technology Evaluation (Early Evaluation Assessment)

    Stakeholders

    HEST8: NICE Health Technology Evaluation

    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
    • Regulatory advisors
    • Commissioners
  • R5:

    Finalise and submit technical file (e.g. design decisions, risk assessments, clinical evaluation report) for CE marking (EU) or UKCA marking (UK only)

    Stakeholders

    R5: CE / UKCA marking

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    may or may not involve
    • Industry
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch
  • P&D5:

    Increase manufacturing for future commercialisation / industry adoption following quality assurance processes to ensure safety and compliance with product specifications. If changes in manufacturing are needed, further regulatory approvals might be required.

    Stakeholders

    P&D5: Scale-up

    keep informed
    • Research Innovation System
    • Funders
    have to involve
    • Industry
  • BM6:

    Finalise and implement the chosen full business model

    Stakeholders

    BM6: Business plan / canvas

    have to involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • BM7:

    Confirm commercial viability of the product; seek company or venture capitalist funding

    Stakeholders

    BM7: Investment required and RoI

    have to involve
    • Funders
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • BM8:

    Refine sales and marketing strategy based on business model

    Stakeholders

    BM8: Marketing and promotion

    may or may not involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • HCE5:

    Refine and finalise plans for post-market surveillance to include in technical plan and clinical follow up

    Stakeholders

    HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    • Clinical champions
    • Potential end users
    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    • Research Innovation System
    • HC professional
    keep informed
    • Funders
Potential funding sources

NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), Horizon Europe, other charities including condition-specific charities, internal translational funding calls, companies, venture capitalists

Deliverables
  • Increase manufacturing for industry adoption
  • Finalised value proposition and target product profile
  • Full health economic analysis
  • Full business model
  • Clinical evaluation report
  • Finalised technical file (including revised regulatory risk assessment) for Regulatory Approval (e.g. CE/UKCA/FDA/Other)
  • Product ready for deployment
  • Sales and marketing plan
  • Post-market surveillance plan / Post-market Clinical Follow-up plan.

T4: Product Launch & Real-world Learning

Activities that lead to product launch, and evaluation of the real-world effectiveness and safety of the innovation, to avoid harm and inform future developments.
[TRL 9]


Collecting real-world evidence, monitor long term safety, efficacy and usage of the device in the general population. This might inform future improvements of the product which might require additional regulatory approvals.

  • HEST7:

    Monitor the end user-business model / procurement case (e.g. product adoption and effect on service post market); ongoing health economic analysis

    Stakeholders

    HEST7: End-user business model / Procurement case

    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
    • Commissioners
    keep informed
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • HEST8:

    Obtaining NICE Health Technology Evaluation recommendation

    Stakeholders

    HEST8: NICE Health Technology Evaluation

    have to involve
    • Research Innovation System
    • Regulatory advisors
    • Commissioners
  • R6:

    Collate post market post-market clinical evidence; update clinical evaluation report annually and maintain quality management system

    Stakeholders

    R6: Post-market surveillance (PMS) and post-market clinical follow up (PMCF)

    have to involve
    • Potential end users
    • Regulatory advisors
    • Industry
    may or may not involve
    • HC professional
    • Public partners
    keep informed
    • Funders
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch
  • P&D5:

    Ensure that manufacturing is performed at a scale which meets with market demand, or further  increase manufacturing output if required. If changes in manufacturing are needed, further regulatory approvals might be required.

    Stakeholders

    P&D5: Scale-up

    keep informed
    • Research Innovation System
    • Funders
    have to involve
    • Industry
    Dependencies

    Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:

    • P&D6: Production and distribution
  • P&D6:

    Product launch and distribution (including strategies for communication and training processes to increase acceptability by end users)

    Stakeholders

    P&D6: Production and distribution

    have to involve
    • Industry
  • BM8:

    Market and promote of device on new markets

    Stakeholders

    BM8: Marketing and promotion

    may or may not involve
    • Technology Transfer Office
  • HCE5:

    Real world evidence post launch (Phase 4); Post-market surveillance and post-market clinical follow-up of the product to collect data on long-term effectiveness, potential adverse effects, and usage of the device

    Stakeholders

    HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch

    have to involve
    • Regulatory advisors
    • Clinical champions
    • Potential end users
    may or may not involve
    • Public partners
    • Research Innovation System
    • HC professional
    keep informed
    • Funders
Potential funding sources

NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), companies, venture capitalists

Deliverables
  • Product launch, adoption and monitoring
  • End-user business model / procurement case
  • NICE Health Technology Evaluation recommendation (if appropriate)
  • Updated clinical evaluation report (CER) with post-market surveillance data and post-market clinical follow-up data.

Basic research that generates new knowledge, insights, methods or technologies, but has no immediate health & care application.
[TRL 1]

Developing novel methods and materials not targeted at a specific health & care application and not for human use

Research and Development (R&D) activities

The R&D lifecycle of a medical device involves the work directed towards the development of an innovation, and/or the improvement of products and processes that are undertaken by researchers (e.g. at an academic/clinical institution or within industry R&D teams).

R&D1: Basic/generic research

Develop generic methods and technology including assessments of biological relevance and indications of biocompatibility

Stakeholders: keep informedhave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Business Model (BM) activities

A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.

BM1: Intellectual property and branding

Understand IP management and contract-related research disclosure agreements

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Potential funding sources

UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Leverhulme Trust, Royal Society, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities, Companies, internal pump priming schemes

Deliverables

  • Generic methods, technology, or materials with indicative evidence of performance (biologically relevant but not for human use).
  • For novel materials, characterisation of the materials system properties and performance in non-biological systems.

Research that addresses a class of health & care problems, developing knowledge, insights, methods or technologies that may underpin innovative solutions.
[TRL 1]

Developing methods and materials to address a specific health & care clinical need (or class of)

Research and Development (R&D) activities

The R&D lifecycle of a medical device involves the work directed towards the development of an innovation, and/or the improvement of products and processes that are undertaken by researchers (e.g. at an academic/clinical institution or within industry R&D teams).

R&D1: Basic/generic research

Develop generic methods and technology of device components, following good laboratory practice (GLP) principles and accurate / detailed record keeping

Stakeholders: keep informedhave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R&D2: Requirements and prior knowledge

Perform scientific literature review; applied methods and technology development based on available health & care data to identify potential application areas within biological environment, understand biocompatibility, toxicity issues , and biodegradability (if applicable)

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involvekeep informed
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Health Economics & Service Transformation (HEST) activities

The translation of a health technology innovation to a medical device used in clinical practice requires an understanding of the costs and benefits of the device as well as of how the device will be embedded in the clinical service.

HEST1: Healthcare context (e.g. problem addressed, scale, current QALY/£ cost)

Identify potential areas for current and foreseeable healthcare applications

Stakeholders: may or may not involvekeep informedhave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Regulation (R) activities

The development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and use of a medical device are governed by a set of laws, standards and guidelines. These regulations are put in place to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical device.

R1: Research governance / Ethics

Consider regulatory approval and other governance issues (e.g. MTAs, HTA) for in vitro and in vivo testing of the material and understanding ethical approvals for testing of medical devices in clinical investigations (including contracts and sponsorship).

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Business Model (BM) activities

A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.

BM1: Intellectual property and branding

Consider IP protection (e.g. patenting), record funding and contracts for IP ownership

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Potential funding sources

UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Leverhulme Trust, Royal Society, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, Internal translational funding calls, Companies

Deliverables

  • Understanding of potential use in healthcare setting
  • Understanding of issues around biocompatibility, toxicity, and efficacy in biological systems
  • Finding / creating indicative evidence from literature or early studies on performance
  • Initiate IP protection if applicable

Research that draws on existing knowledge, insights, methods or technologies to develop the concept for an innovative solution to a specific health & care problem.
[TRL 2]

Reaching out to stakeholders from STEM, applied health research and clinical practice to provide insights necessary todesign and develop an innovative concept/device for addressing a specific health & care problem.

Research and Development (R&D) activities

The R&D lifecycle of a medical device involves the work directed towards the development of an innovation, and/or the improvement of products and processes that are undertaken by researchers (e.g. at an academic/clinical institution or within industry R&D teams).

R&D2: Requirements and prior knowledge

Record device requirements, prior knowledge, and evidence of a valid clinical association to inform device specification

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involvekeep informed
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R&D3: Concept development and refinement leading to prototype

Prototype design and development (not for human use). Assess efficacy in preclinical models (in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo – small and large animal models)

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involvekeep informed
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R&D4: Human factors

Consider human factors that can influence concept design and development (e.g. will the device need removing? what are the consequences if not?)

Stakeholders: have to involvekeep informed
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R&D5: Responsible innovation

Consider responsible innovation, including potential effects on the environment, that can influence concept design and development

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involvekeep informed
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Health Economics & Service Transformation (HEST) activities

The translation of a health technology innovation to a medical device used in clinical practice requires an understanding of the costs and benefits of the device as well as of how the device will be embedded in the clinical service.

HEST1: Healthcare context (e.g. problem addressed, scale, current QALY/£ cost)

Understand current and foreseeable specific health & care need

Stakeholders: may or may not involvekeep informedhave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

HEST2: Current clinical care pathway (guidelines)

Understand current and foreseeable clinical care pathway and guidelines of care for the specific clinical need

Stakeholders: have to involvekeep informed
Dependencies:

No dependencies

HEST3: Real-world evaluation of clinical care pathway (delivery)

Understand current and foreseeable clinical care workflow and current gold standard of care for the specific clinical need

Dependencies:

No dependencies

HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)

Understand on how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice

Stakeholders: may or may not involvehave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile

Prepare initial target product profile to define an outline of the value proposition – what is the expected benefit of the device in terms of costs, patient care. Consider competing solutions (existing or currently under development) which might impact the clinical need, guidance, workflows or pathways. This will be needed for funding applications and the technical file.

Stakeholders: may or may not involvehave to involve
Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • R2: Intended use and device categorisation

HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)

Conceptualise health economics evaluation and cost benefit analyses (“desk research”, literature review) and conceptualise a preliminary health economic model which will inform concept development (considering current and upcoming competing solutions).

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Regulation (R) activities

The development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and use of a medical device are governed by a set of laws, standards and guidelines. These regulations are put in place to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical device.

R1: Research governance / Ethics

Arrange ethical approvals (including sponsorship) for suitable (pre)clinical testing of concept

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R2: Intended use and device categorisation

Formalise intended use (based on HEST2/3); Understanding of device regulations and risk classification to inform concept development (including identification of regulatory steps needed for future clinical testing)

Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • HEST2: Current clinical care pathway (guidelines)
  • HEST3: Real-world evaluation of clinical care pathway (delivery)

R3: Quality management system (ISO 13485 certification)

Understand the requirements for accurate audit trail / traceability of prototype device development is in place through a quality management system.

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Productisation & Distribution (P&D) activities

The innovative technology needs to be manufactured into a regulated medical device product for it to be delivered to the end user (e.g. healthcare provider, patient). This process includes activities around quality control, packaging/labelling as well as distribution and sales.

P&D1: Manufacturing/software-engineering

    • Requirements analysis
    • Design
    • Development
    • Test
    • Implementation

Development of prototype and design initial production process (not for human use) with view to adapt (for human use) and scaling up considering regulatory implications for clinical investigations.

Dependencies:

No dependencies

Business Model (BM) activities

A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.

BM1: Intellectual property and branding

Consider additional IP protection based on concept development (could include design and manufacturing processes), consider freedom to operate; record funding and contracts for IP ownership.

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM2: Market size (UK, Worldwide)

Understand the market and its size to determine commercial opportunities and potential economic impact

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM3: Market share (realistic assumptions)

Understand of potential market share based on competing solutions and analysis of competitors

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM4: Product vs service

Understand on the nature of the intervention within the clinical landscape and consider plans for delivering device to market

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM5: Spinout vs licence

Understand potential exit strategies such as commercialisation venues (e.g. spin out vs license vs not-for-profit (e.g. via community interest company) )

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Health and Care Evaluation (HCE) activities

Health and care evaluation of a health technology innovation involves assessing its safety, efficacy and effectiveness. This assessment is necessary for regulatory approval of the innovation as medical device before it enters the market. It also includes ongoing monitoring of the device once it is being used in clinical practice.

HCE1: Critical evaluation of concept

Collect patient and end user feedback of concept

Dependencies:

No dependencies

Potential funding sources

UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Internal translational funding calls, Companies.

Deliverables

  • Clearly articulated health & care need
  • Solution concept and prototype device manufacturing including plans for scaling up production with clinically relevant methods.
  • Draft of intended use statement
  • Draft of initial value proposition and target product profile
  • Ethical approval ready for preclinical testing in D4 (small and/or large animal models)
  • Initial indications of market potential / opportunity (including product/market fit)

Research that develops the proposed health & care innovation and provides initial evidence for the feasibility of the proposed innovation.
[TRL 3, 4]

Obtain proof of concept of feasibility and efficacy of the prototype device in preclinical model(s). This may be an iterative process that requires testing of multiple different prototypes

Research and Development (R&D) activities

The R&D lifecycle of a medical device involves the work directed towards the development of an innovation, and/or the improvement of products and processes that are undertaken by researchers (e.g. at an academic/clinical institution or within industry R&D teams).

R&D3: Concept development and refinement leading to prototype

Full prototype (human use) development, manufacture at good manufacturing practice (GMP) level, and complete pre-clinical testing

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involvekeep informed
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R&D4: Human factors

Include human centric design principles in prototype

Stakeholders: have to involvekeep informed
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R&D5: Responsible innovation

Ensure prototype design meets regulatory and GMP manufacturing requirements, is sustainable in design, is sourced from ethically verified materials and its manufacture is auditable. This can be performed by external industry partner/ test house

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involvekeep informed
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)

Determine if biocompatibility / toxicity / biodegradability and formulation of prototype device with methods and materials that are suitable for (human) use in a clinical setting and compare to current clinical solutions. This can be performed by external industry partner/ test house

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R&D7: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care feasibility and efficacy

Adapt prototype based on pre-clinical data and key stakeholder feedback to ensure health and care feasibility will be achieved (design input)

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involvekeep informed
Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • HCE1: Critical evaluation of concept

Health Economics & Service Transformation (HEST) activities

The translation of a health technology innovation to a medical device used in clinical practice requires an understanding of the costs and benefits of the device as well as of how the device will be embedded in the clinical service.

HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)

Review how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice

Stakeholders: may or may not involvehave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile

Review the value proposition for the developed prototype highlighting benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions.

Stakeholders: may or may not involvehave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)

Review the conceptualised health economics model and cost benefit analyses which will inform on what data needs to be collected.

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Regulation (R) activities

The development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and use of a medical device are governed by a set of laws, standards and guidelines. These regulations are put in place to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical device.

R1: Research governance / Ethics

Prepare ethics and research governance applications (including sponsorship) for clinical investigations / feasibility studies in T1 – T4 stages

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R2: Intended use and device categorisation

Determine device categorisation and necessary regulatory approvals required.

Dependencies:

No dependencies

R3: Quality management system (ISO 13485 certification)

Ensure accurate audit trail / traceability of prototype device development (inc. device materials, design iterations and equipment uses) is in place for example by working through a quality management system (ISO13485)

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R4: Clinical investigation approval

Initialise a technical file (incl risk assessment), determine the documentation required for MHRA notification for clinical investigation approval

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R5: CE / UKCA marking

Understand the requirements for Regulatory Approvals (e.g. CE / UKCA / FDA / other). Ensure requirements for clinical investigation standards are met.

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Productisation & Distribution (P&D) activities

The innovative technology needs to be manufactured into a regulated medical device product for it to be delivered to the end user (e.g. healthcare provider, patient). This process includes activities around quality control, packaging/labelling as well as distribution and sales.

P&D1: Manufacturing/software-engineering

    • Requirements analysis
    • Design
    • Development
    • Test
    • Implementation

Optimise the full prototype (if applicable) for human use and refine production methods for preclinical testing. Seek industry partners (including service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors - also considering start-up formation)

Dependencies:

No dependencies

P&D2: Testing protocols

Develop testing protocols for the full prototype in pre-clinical models and understanding of protocols for the final product required for clinical investigations.

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

P&D3: Safety, compliance, interoperability and usability

Test compliance with technical file requirements (safety, compliance, interoperability and usability)

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involvekeep informed
Dependencies:

No dependencies

P&D4: Quality control

Conduct quality control of the prototype according to product specifications

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Business Model (BM) activities

A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.

BM2: Market size (UK, Worldwide)

Identify market (i.e. target payer vs user), refine market size analysis to determine if there is a viable market

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM3: Market share (realistic assumptions)

Refine market share analysis including analysis of competitors and opportunities and Finalise market share assumptions to feed into HEST4

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM4: Product vs service

Start defining the nature of the intervention within the clinical landscape and initialize plans for delivering device to market

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM5: Spinout vs licence

Start Exploring potential exit strategies such as commercialisation venues (e.g. spin out vs license vs not-for-profit (e.g. via community interest company))

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM6: Business plan / canvas

Draft an outline of the business model (considering future requirements/steps, plan to seek for investors/funding for larger / pivotal / multisite clinical studies)

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Health and Care Evaluation (HCE) activities

Health and care evaluation of a health technology innovation involves assessing its safety, efficacy and effectiveness. This assessment is necessary for regulatory approval of the innovation as medical device before it enters the market. It also includes ongoing monitoring of the device once it is being used in clinical practice.

HCE1: Critical evaluation of concept

Evaluate prototype in the competitive landscape based on pre-clinical studies (i.e. how does the prototype compare to gold standard). Create a clinical evaluation plan (CEP) to define the scope and outline the systematic approach of the planned clinical investigation to demonstrate scientific, analytical and clinical validity

Dependencies:

No dependencies

Potential funding sources

UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Innovate UK, Internal translational funding calls, Companies

Deliverables

  • Full functional prototype (for human use) with indicative evidence of performance in relevant preclinical models
  • Obtain safety testing certification for full prototype
  • Auditable records available (e.g. QMS) for device component manufacturing and device testing.
  • Revised value proposition and target product profile
  • Finalised intended use statement
  • Potential service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors have been identified
  • Revised summary of market opportunity (demonstrating commercial feasibility and competitiveness)
  • Proposed strategy for delivering the innovation to market (including academic exit strategy)
  • Initial outline business model
  • Initial regulatory risk assessment
  • Initial technical file
  • Clinical evaluation plan

Research that further develops the proposed health & care innovation and provides reproducible evidence for its efficacy and safety in a relevant environment.
[TRL 5, 6]

Perform feasibility studies in clinical setting (Phase I, first in man study) with refined prototype to generate evidence of health & care relevance and safety in a realistic but controlled health & care setting. This may be an iterative process that requires testing of multiple different prototypes before committing to the final design

Research and Development (R&D) activities

The R&D lifecycle of a medical device involves the work directed towards the development of an innovation, and/or the improvement of products and processes that are undertaken by researchers (e.g. at an academic/clinical institution or within industry R&D teams).

R&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)

Refine the final prototype for use in a small scale, first in man, feasibility study on small patient groups for usability, safety testing and considerations of efficacy

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R&D7: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care feasibility and efficacy

Adapt prototype based on preliminary clinical data and key stakeholder feedback to ensure health and care feasibility and efficacy will be achieved (design input)

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involvekeep informed
Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • HCE2: Health and care feasibility
  • R4: Clinical investigation approval

R&D8: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care effectiveness

Refine the prototype to ensure health and care effectiveness will be achieved

Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • HCE2: Health and care feasibility

R&D9: Freeze design

Completion of R&D activities including the creation of the Device Master List (DML, detailing all processes required to create the device; to include in the technical file) and freeze of the design of the refined product.

Stakeholders: may or may not involvekeep informed
Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • HCE2: Health and care feasibility

Health Economics & Service Transformation (HEST) activities

The translation of a health technology innovation to a medical device used in clinical practice requires an understanding of the costs and benefits of the device as well as of how the device will be embedded in the clinical service.

HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)

Refine how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice

Stakeholders: may or may not involvehave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile

Refine a value proposition for the developed prototype highlighting benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions

Stakeholders: may or may not involvehave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)

Refine the conceptualisation of the health economics model and cost benefit analyses which will inform health economics data collection needs

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Regulation (R) activities

The development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and use of a medical device are governed by a set of laws, standards and guidelines. These regulations are put in place to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical device.

R1: Research governance / Ethics

Gain ethical and research governance clearance (including sponsorship) for current and subsequent clinical studies

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R3: Quality management system (ISO 13485 certification)

Obtain ISO 13485 Certification, and any other required ISO certificates (e.g. 27001). Relevant ISO standard include (but are not limited to) ISO 10993 (biological testing requirements), ISO 14644 (GMP manufacturing), ISO 14155 (GCP – good clinical practice), ISO-11137-2 ISO 11737 (sterilisation and validation of sterilisation), and ISO 14971 (risk management), ISO 20417 (information to be supplied by manufacturer), ISO 14630 (non active surgical implants), ISO 15223 (labelling), ISO 11607 (packaging), and ISO 20416 (post market surveillance.) Involve industry partners (e.g. manufacturer) as needed to obtain ISO certification.

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R4: Clinical investigation approval

Refine and submit the technical file (e.g. design decisions, regulatory risk assessments, test methods) for MHRA approval for clinical investigation

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • R&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)

R5: CE / UKCA marking

Start collecting clinical evidence on efficacy and safety for Regulatory compliance (e.g. CE/UKCA/FDA/Other), and if affecting clinical outcomes run the study to accepted good clinical practice (GCP) standards (e.g. ISO14155)

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Productisation & Distribution (P&D) activities

The innovative technology needs to be manufactured into a regulated medical device product for it to be delivered to the end user (e.g. healthcare provider, patient). This process includes activities around quality control, packaging/labelling as well as distribution and sales.

P&D1: Manufacturing/software-engineering

    • Requirements analysis
    • Design
    • Development
    • Test
    • Implementation

Work with industry partners (including service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors- also considering start-up formation) to produce the final quality assured product, based on the final prototype, to be used in clinical setting

Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • R&D6: Technical feasibility (pilot demonstration, materials biocompatibility/formulation)
  • R&D7: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care feasibility and efficacy
  • R&D8: Adapting/extending to achieve health and care effectiveness
  • R&D9: Freeze design

P&D2: Testing protocols

Develop testing protocols for the final quality assured product in a clinical setting

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

P&D3: Safety, compliance, interoperability and usability

Test compliance with technical file requirements (safety, compliance, interoperability and usability)

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involvekeep informed
Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • P&D5: Scale-up

P&D4: Quality control

Conduct quality control of the product according to product specifications

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • P&D5: Scale-up

P&D5: Scale-up

Scale up production and batch release (GMP compliant) for first in man clinical investigation

Stakeholders: keep informedhave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Business Model (BM) activities

A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.

BM4: Product vs service

Finalise the nature of the intervention within the clinical landscape and initialize plans for delivering device to market

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM5: Spinout vs licence

Finalise plans for potential academic exit strategies such as commercialisation venues (e.g. spin out vs license vs not-for-profit (e.g. via community interest company)) to position the proposed intervention within the clinical landscape

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM6: Business plan / canvas

Refine the business model (considering future requirements/steps, plan to seek for investors/funding for larger / pivotal / multisite clinical studies)

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Health and Care Evaluation (HCE) activities

Health and care evaluation of a health technology innovation involves assessing its safety, efficacy and effectiveness. This assessment is necessary for regulatory approval of the innovation as medical device before it enters the market. It also includes ongoing monitoring of the device once it is being used in clinical practice.

HCE1: Critical evaluation of concept

Position of the concept within the competitive landscape and perform health & care risk assessment

Dependencies:

No dependencies

HCE2: Health and care feasibility

Perform clinical evaluation of prototype in first in man, Phase I, clinical investigation study to assess feasibility and safety

Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • R4: Clinical investigation approval

HCE3: Health and care evaluation of safety and efficacy

Perform clinical evaluation of prototype clinical investigation study to assess feasibility, safety, and efficacy. This can be, but does not need to be, the same clinical investigation undertaken in HCE2

Dependencies:

No dependencies

Potential funding sources

UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), Innovate UK, Internal translational funding calls, Companies, Venture capitalists

Deliverables

  • Final product (frozen development/design)
  • Submission of the revised technical file and obtain MHRA approval for clinical investigation
  • Refine GMP manufacturing and release of batch for clinical testing
  • Phase I, first in man, safety testing of GMP prototype in small cohorts (10-20) for preliminary feasibility, safety and efficacy assessment, and to inform larger study design
  • Revised value proposition and target product profile
  • Conceptual health economic model with preliminary data
  • Relationships have been established with potential service providers, suppliers, manufacturers and distributors
  • Development process according to ISO13485
  • Revised strategy for delivering the innovation to market (including academic exit strategy)
  • Revised outline business model
  • Evidence of utility in a health and care setting

Investigations that evaluate the proposed innovation in a health & care setting, providing actionable evidence of its efficacy, effectiveness and safety in a patient population.
[TRL 7]

Perform pivotal studies in larger cohorts to assess safety, efficacy, and effectiveness

Health Economics & Service Transformation (HEST) activities

The translation of a health technology innovation to a medical device used in clinical practice requires an understanding of the costs and benefits of the device as well as of how the device will be embedded in the clinical service.

HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)

Refine how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice based on your own data acquired in the clinical investigation

Stakeholders: may or may not involvehave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile

Refine the value proposition for the developed prototype by integrating your own data to highlight benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions

Stakeholders: may or may not involvehave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)

Refine health economics evaluation by integrating your own data to inform the cost benefit analyses

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • HCE3: Health and care evaluation of safety and efficacy
  • HCE4: Health and care validation of safety and efficacy, effectiveness

Regulation (R) activities

The development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and use of a medical device are governed by a set of laws, standards and guidelines. These regulations are put in place to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical device.

R1: Research governance / Ethics

Gain ethical and research governance clearance (including sponsorship) for current and subsequent clinical studies

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R4: Clinical investigation approval

Seek approval for subsequent clinical studies. Notify Regulatory Authority (e.g. MHRA in the UK) of any design changes that might have occurred since the first clinical investigation approval

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

R5: CE / UKCA marking

Refine the technical file for Regulatory Compliance (e.g. CE/UKCA/FDA/Other) (e.g. design decisions, risk assessments, test methods) (engaging notified body)

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Productisation & Distribution (P&D) activities

The innovative technology needs to be manufactured into a regulated medical device product for it to be delivered to the end user (e.g. healthcare provider, patient). This process includes activities around quality control, packaging/labelling as well as distribution and sales.

P&D3: Safety, compliance, interoperability and usability

Test compliance with technical file requirements (safety, compliance, interoperability and usability)

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involvekeep informed
Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • P&D5: Scale-up

P&D4: Quality control

Conduct quality control of the product according to product specifications

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • P&D5: Scale-up

P&D5: Scale-up

Increase manufacturing (if needed) for the larger clinical investigation studies

Stakeholders: keep informedhave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Business Model (BM) activities

A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.

BM4: Product vs service

Review commercial strategy to deliver the device to market (consider refinements of the product/service)

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM5: Spinout vs licence

Review commercial strategy including the academic exit strategy (e.g. spinout vs license)

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM6: Business plan / canvas

Refine business model to implement future steps

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM7: Investment required and RoI

Assess the commercial viability of the product to confirm that the manufacturing, distribution and marketing of the device is financially sustainable (including return-on-investment analysis); seek company or venture capitalist funding

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Health and Care Evaluation (HCE) activities

Health and care evaluation of a health technology innovation involves assessing its safety, efficacy and effectiveness. This assessment is necessary for regulatory approval of the innovation as medical device before it enters the market. It also includes ongoing monitoring of the device once it is being used in clinical practice.

HCE3: Health and care evaluation of safety and efficacy

Conduct large scale clinical investigation study in relevant patient groups to validate safety and efficacy of the device

Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • R4: Clinical investigation approval

HCE4: Health and care validation of safety and efficacy, effectiveness

Larger scale / pivotal / multisite clinical investigation study in relevant patient groups to validate safety, efficacy and effectiveness of the device. Write a clinical evaluation report (CER) summarising the clinical outcomes of the clinical investigations for inclusion in technical file to notified body.

Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • R4: Clinical investigation approval

HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch

Initialise plans for post-market surveillance to include in technical plan and clinical follow up

Dependencies:

No dependencies

Potential funding sources

UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Royal Academy of Engineering, Horizon Europe, Other charities including condition-specific charities, LifeArc, NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), Innovate UK, Internal translational funding calls, Companies, Venture capitalists

Deliverables

  • Clinical assessment of feasibility, safety and efficacy in large clinical investigation study
  • Clinical validation of safety, efficacy, and effectiveness in a larger/pivotal clinical study
  • Partnerships have been formed with key stakeholders (e.g. suppliers, service providers, manufacturers, distributors / customers)
  • Clinical Evaluation Report (CER)

Activities that finalise the regulatory approvals, and the commercialisation, implementation and scaling-up strategies for the health & care innovation.
[TRL 8]

Obtaining Regulatory approvals; service transformation modelling and health economics modelling to prove benefit of device; development of business plan to attract funding for launch and adoption into market.

Health Economics & Service Transformation (HEST) activities

The translation of a health technology innovation to a medical device used in clinical practice requires an understanding of the costs and benefits of the device as well as of how the device will be embedded in the clinical service.

HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)

Finalise how the device will affect current and foreseeable service/clinical practice (health & care pathway based on your own data acquired in the clinical investigation

Stakeholders: may or may not involvehave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

HEST5: Value proposition (e.g. expected benefit, cost savings, improving efficiency, improving patient satisfaction) / Target Product Profile

Finalise the value proposition for the developed prototype by integrating your own data to highlight benefits compared to current gold standard of care and existing competing solutions

Stakeholders: may or may not involvehave to involve
Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • HEST4: Service transformation model (change in clinical care pathway)
  • HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)

HEST6: Health economic analysis to address the value proposition claims (cost-benefit analysis)

Finalising full Health economics evaluation and cost benefit analyses

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

HEST7: End-user business model / Procurement case

Define the end user-business model / procurement case

Stakeholders: have to involvekeep informed
Dependencies:

No dependencies

HEST8: NICE Health Technology Evaluation

Consider adoption of the product into policy and/or guidelines as a routine method or approach; NICE Health Technology Evaluation (Early Evaluation Assessment)

Dependencies:

No dependencies

Regulation (R) activities

The development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and use of a medical device are governed by a set of laws, standards and guidelines. These regulations are put in place to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical device.

R5: CE / UKCA marking

Finalise and submit technical file (e.g. design decisions, risk assessments, clinical evaluation report) for CE marking (EU) or UKCA marking (UK only)

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involve
Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch

Productisation & Distribution (P&D) activities

The innovative technology needs to be manufactured into a regulated medical device product for it to be delivered to the end user (e.g. healthcare provider, patient). This process includes activities around quality control, packaging/labelling as well as distribution and sales.

P&D5: Scale-up

Increase manufacturing for future commercialisation / industry adoption following quality assurance processes to ensure safety and compliance with product specifications. If changes in manufacturing are needed, further regulatory approvals might be required.

Stakeholders: keep informedhave to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Business Model (BM) activities

A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.

BM6: Business plan / canvas

Finalise and implement the chosen full business model

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM7: Investment required and RoI

Confirm commercial viability of the product; seek company or venture capitalist funding

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

BM8: Marketing and promotion

Refine sales and marketing strategy based on business model

Stakeholders: may or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Health and Care Evaluation (HCE) activities

Health and care evaluation of a health technology innovation involves assessing its safety, efficacy and effectiveness. This assessment is necessary for regulatory approval of the innovation as medical device before it enters the market. It also includes ongoing monitoring of the device once it is being used in clinical practice.

HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch

Refine and finalise plans for post-market surveillance to include in technical plan and clinical follow up

Dependencies:

No dependencies

Potential funding sources

NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), Horizon Europe, other charities including condition-specific charities, internal translational funding calls, companies, venture capitalists

Deliverables

  • Increase manufacturing for industry adoption
  • Finalised value proposition and target product profile
  • Full health economic analysis
  • Full business model
  • Clinical evaluation report
  • Finalised technical file (including revised regulatory risk assessment) for Regulatory Approval (e.g. CE/UKCA/FDA/Other)
  • Product ready for deployment
  • Sales and marketing plan
  • Post-market surveillance plan / Post-market Clinical Follow-up plan.

Activities that lead to product launch, and evaluation of the real-world effectiveness and safety of the innovation, to avoid harm and inform future developments.
[TRL 9]

Collecting real-world evidence, monitor long term safety, efficacy and usage of the device in the general population. This might inform future improvements of the product which might require additional regulatory approvals.

Health Economics & Service Transformation (HEST) activities

The translation of a health technology innovation to a medical device used in clinical practice requires an understanding of the costs and benefits of the device as well as of how the device will be embedded in the clinical service.

HEST7: End-user business model / Procurement case

Monitor the end user-business model / procurement case (e.g. product adoption and effect on service post market); ongoing health economic analysis

Stakeholders: have to involvekeep informed
Dependencies:

No dependencies

HEST8: NICE Health Technology Evaluation

Obtaining NICE Health Technology Evaluation recommendation

Dependencies:

No dependencies

Regulation (R) activities

The development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and use of a medical device are governed by a set of laws, standards and guidelines. These regulations are put in place to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the medical device.

R6: Post-market surveillance (PMS) and post-market clinical follow up (PMCF)

Collate post market post-market clinical evidence; update clinical evaluation report annually and maintain quality management system

Stakeholders: have to involvemay or may not involvekeep informed
Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch

Productisation & Distribution (P&D) activities

The innovative technology needs to be manufactured into a regulated medical device product for it to be delivered to the end user (e.g. healthcare provider, patient). This process includes activities around quality control, packaging/labelling as well as distribution and sales.

P&D5: Scale-up

Ensure that manufacturing is performed at a scale which meets with market demand, or further  increase manufacturing output if required. If changes in manufacturing are needed, further regulatory approvals might be required.

Stakeholders: keep informedhave to involve
Dependencies:
Before undertaking this activity, you need to have completed the following:
  • P&D6: Production and distribution

P&D6: Production and distribution

Product launch and distribution (including strategies for communication and training processes to increase acceptability by end users)

Stakeholders: have to involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Business Model (BM) activities

A business model is required to understand the commercial opportunities for the innovation and to plan the sustainable delivery of value. The business model for a medical device addresses how value is created and delivered to patients and healthcare providers. This applies to both for-profit and non-profit endeavours.

BM8: Marketing and promotion

Market and promote of device on new markets

Stakeholders: may or may not involve
Dependencies:

No dependencies

Health and Care Evaluation (HCE) activities

Health and care evaluation of a health technology innovation involves assessing its safety, efficacy and effectiveness. This assessment is necessary for regulatory approval of the innovation as medical device before it enters the market. It also includes ongoing monitoring of the device once it is being used in clinical practice.

HCE5: Real world evidence post-launch

Real world evidence post launch (Phase 4); Post-market surveillance and post-market clinical follow-up of the product to collect data on long-term effectiveness, potential adverse effects, and usage of the device

Dependencies:

No dependencies

Potential funding sources

NIHR, Accelerated Access Collaborative (SBRI Healthcare), companies, venture capitalists

Deliverables

  • Product launch, adoption and monitoring
  • End-user business model / procurement case
  • NICE Health Technology Evaluation recommendation (if appropriate)
  • Updated clinical evaluation report (CER) with post-market surveillance data and post-market clinical follow-up data.